Consultants Forum    |   FacilityLocations    |   FastFacility    |   Advertise    |   Subscribe    |   Newsletter    |   RSSRSS
Inward Investment Guides
Automotive In-Sourcing: A Long-Term North American Trend?
Gregory Burkart, Detroit Manging Director, Duff & Phelps (Automotive Site Guide 2012)
(page 2 of 2)
Figure 3: The auto industry, if not explicitly endorsing “in-sourcing,” has supported the movement with almost $14 billion in new capital investments. Of the 15 largest projects receiving a CICI Award for Corporate Investment in 2011, eight projects were related to the auto industry.
Making a Site Selection
All of this talk about in-sourcing can better inform future site selection activity. When deciding where to locate new facilities, companies should consider three things:

  • 1. If companies are willing to repatriate projects where labor content is less than 25 percent of the total manufacturing costs, and if labor productivity is key to their competitiveness, then they should look at states and local communities with a highly skilled work force capable of handling their jobs. In addition, states that encourage flexibility in their work rules will foster companies' productivity.

  • 2. To enhance the productivity of workers, companies are investing large sums in capital-intensive equipment. They should look for states and local communities that reward these investments by lowering property taxes associated with personal property. Remember the economic axiom: "If you tax something, you receive less of it."

  • 3. Since the goods that will be manufactured in the United States have lower labor content but relatively higher logistics costs (i.e., steel, aluminum, and plastics), efficient and reliable infrastructure is critical. One of the reasons that Toyota, Honda, and Ford are investing in the United States is that their production in Thailand was shut down for an extended period of time because the floods disrupted both their supply chain and their actual production operations. Good freeway access, efficient rail yards (with dual access to multiple carriers), and a port with efficient and predictable labor relations are essential to efficient management of logistics costs.
Figure 1: When you examine levels of manufacturing employment in 1992, 2002, and 2012, Ross Perot looks like a prophet. All told, the United States lost approximately 1.5 million manufacturing jobs during the 1990s. To add to the catastrophe, the United States lost another 3.5 million jobs during first decade of the 21st century. Click chart to enlarge.
Figure 2: During the past two years, the United States has added approximately 370,000 new jobs; by 2015, some experts predict that the United States could add a total of 1.1 million new manufacturing jobs. Click chart to enlarge.

It's an exciting time again in the automotive industry. For all of those who bled during the dark days of 2009 and 2010, it's especially nice to hear what one might describe as a louder sucking sound right here at home.

<< Back  Page1 2   
Have questions, comments or concerns about this article? Submit to Ask Area Development here and the author or an expert from our network of site selection and facility planning professionals will answer:
Article Discussion
News Items
Around The Web
News Items
Around The Web