Sometime before September 15, 2011, as mandated by the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Commission, the 3,300-acre Brunswick Naval Air Station (BNAS) in Brunswick, Maine, is going to close. About 3,000 military personnel and 1,400 reservists will leave the area, along with about 700 military spouses employed by area businesses. For those left behind, civilian job losses are projected to exceed 2,000, pushing the area's unemployment rate to almost 10 percent. Anticipated income loss to the region, including $14 million in rent and mortgage payments when 2,300 housing units enter the market, is projected to exceed $150 million annually.
"This closure is equivalent, in Maine terms, to 10 paper mill closings," says Jeffrey Jordan, deputy director of the Brunswick Local Redevelopment Authority, which is in charge of formulating and implementing a reuse plan for the base.
Fortunately for Brunswick and about two dozen other communities throughout the United States that are currently facing a major military base closure as a result of BRAC 2005 decisions, the situation is not as bleak as it sounds. For many of these communities, the base closure may even be a blessing in disguise.
The communities on the closure list have the advantage of experience gained from four previous BRAC rounds - 1988, 1991, 1993, and 1995 - in which a total of 97 major bases were closed. A large number of these former military installations are now thriving with new residential, retail, office, educational, institutional, and industrial developments that in many cases have already more than replaced the number of jobs lost in the closure.
In Denver, Colorado, Lowry Air Force Base (BRAC 1991) lost more than 4,000 military personnel and about 2,275 civilian jobs when it closed in 1994. Now the 1,866-acre former base is a mixed-use community with more than 7,000 new jobs, and is considered a model for urban infilling and smart growth. In Phoenix, Arizona, the former Williams Air Force Base (BRAC 1993), which lost 2,300 military personnel and 728 civilian jobs, is now the Williams Gateway Airport and Williams Campus, with about 4,000 new jobs. It is home to more than 35 aerospace-related companies, including Boeing, plus an education and research facility that serves more than 6,000 college students. And there are dozens of other success stories.
The Department of Defense's Office of Economic Adjustment (OEA) manages the complex process of transitioning military properties to civilian use. According to a December 2006 OEA report, of the 73 communities that it had identified as "adversely impacted" in the previous four BRAC rounds, 72 already have or will have office and industrial parks at their former bases, and 21 have established municipal or general aviation airports.
Lessons learned from each BRAC round have helped refine the process with new, creative ways of conveying the property from the military service to the Local Resource Authority (LRA), and the OEA continues to expand its resources to assist LRAs with their reuse planning and implementation.
Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, also on the BRAC 2005 closure list, will see the departure of about 620 military personnel from the Army's Communications Electronics Command (CECOM), many of whom will transfer to Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland. Potential job loss to the area could exceed 20,000, according to Frank Cosentino, executive director of the Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Planning Authority, which is the LRA for the base. This figure includes 12,000 to 15,000 contractor jobs, plus nearly 5,000 additional civilian jobs.
"There is an enormous potential downside," says Cosentino. But he is optimistic that the three communities adjacent to the 1,126-acre base - Tinton Falls, Eatontown, and Oceanport - will reach a consensus on the best redevelopment strategy. The LRA enlisted a consulting firm to help develop its reuse plan, which it must submit to the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Department of the Army before the end of the year.
Hundreds of community members have participated in planning workshops and completed an extensive "Visual Preference Survey" featuring pictures of community settings and building styles. "We have insisted that people look at it holistically," says Cosentino. "Don't look at just what you think will be an adjunct to your town. Look at the entire fort property because it has to flow." Evaluation of existing buildings at Fort Monmouth - approximately 5 million square feet - is underway. "The concept is to see how they work in the context of this visioning process and what people want to see here," says Cosentino.
The Brunswick LRA is going through a similar visioning process for BNAS. Like Fort Monmouth, Brunswick is looking at the creation of a "pedestrian-friendly village" in which residential, commercial, institutional, and recreational areas will be within walking distance of each other. "We envision an integrated living, learning, and business community," says Jordan, "integrated into the Brunswick community through a network of pedestrian and bike trails, transit lines and roadways."
Consultants for the project have identified several industry sectors that would be strong opportunities for economic growth at BNAS, including information technology and data management, biomedical industries, alternative energy development, marine and aviation composite R&D and manufacturing, and general and corporate aviation and aviation maintenance and repair. A previous study determined that commercial passenger flights or cargo service would not be feasible at Brunswick, but general aviation flights, federal R&D, aerospace manufacturing, and aircraft maintenance would be possible.
Environmental Cleanup Issues
big stumbling block to base redevelopment in prior BRAC rounds has been
the delay in environmental cleanup that has slowed the transfer of
property to the LRAs. Some closed bases still have large tracts with
chemical contamination, unexploded ordinance dangers, or other
environmental hazards. Recently, a new procedure called an
Environmental Services Cooperative Agreement (ESCA) has been
established to help speed the process.
"Before, the military
would clean up the property based on its annual allocation, and it may
not necessarily have been the piece of the base that the community
needed to advance its reuse plan," says Paul Kalomiris, executive
director of the Association of Defense Communities. "Now the LRA can
target the cleanup toward the land on the base that is central to its
At Alabama's 47,000-acre Fort McClellan (BRAC
1995), about 6,000 acres are contaminated with unexploded ordinance,
and there are also 10 landfills, 38 underground storage tanks, three
major groundwater plumes, and numerous other problem sites still to be
remedied. The McClellan Joint Powers Authority, the LRA for the base,
negotiated an ESCA with the Army, estimating remaining cleanup cost at
around $200 million, and received the contaminated property in an early
transfer so that it could privatize the cleanup work. Already at
McClellan there is an 18,000-acre master-planned community, and 3,000
jobs have been created there since the base closed in 1999.
California, the Air Force agreed to pay the Sacramento County LRA $11.2
million in an ESCA to remove the top 15 feet of PCB-contaminated soil
from a 62-acre parcel at the former McClellan Air Force Base (BRAC
1995), and the Army is paying $100 million to the LRA at Ford Ord (BRAC
1991) in Marina to remove munitions and explosives in 3,500 acres of
the 28,000-acre former base.
Kalomiris notes that during the
current BRAC round, the military has done "a much better job" in
providing LRAs with accurate information on environmental conditions on
its bases. Michael Houlemard, executive officer of the Fort Ord Reuse
Authority, warns, however, that although the information provided about
the status of transitioning bases is critical, it is not always
reliable. "It is crucial to have early and continuous access to both
physical spaces on former installations and the military personnel who
manage those facilities in order to adequately understand the
constraints and the opportunities of closing base properties," he says.
main difference between BRAC 2005 and prior BRAC rounds was the
military's primary objective. Previous rounds were more about force
reduction, says Kalomiris. In the 2005 round, the focus was on the goal
of creating more efficient missions and more efficiently operated
bases. As a result, about 20 communities will see significant levels of
mission growth, which creates its own set of challenges in terms of
infrastructure, schools, healthcare, and other services that must be
expanded to accommodate the sudden population growth.
major expansions include Fort Sam Houston in San Antonio and Fort Bliss
in El Paso. Virginia will see growth at Fort Lee and Fort Belvoir, and
Maryland is bracing for an influx of personnel at Fort Meade, Aberdeen
Proving Ground, and several other bases. Other installations with
significant mission growth include Fort Sill, Oklahoma; Fort Knox,
Kentucky; and Fort Carson, Colorado.
defense communities and the bases they host have become much more
sophisticated. Some states facing major mission growth have enacted
special legislation to help with increased demands on infrastructure
and education systems. Maryland even established a BRAC subcabinet to
help coordinate planning. San Antonio, which has a variety of bases and
is dealing with both closures and expansions, recently created an
Office of Military Transformation.
"The Defense Department and
defense communities have always been partners, and we're seeing even
more of those partnerships between bases and their communities," says
The military is also increasing partnerships with the
private sector through Enhanced Use Leasing (EUL), which brings
companies onto bases to establish facilities that advance mission
objectives. Two major new projects, both envisioned to exceed 1 million
square feet of office and laboratory space, are the Picatinny Applied
Research Campus at the Army's Picatinny Arsenal in New Jersey and the
Emerald Coast Center at Elgin Air Force Base in Florida. Bases
throughout the country are also using EUL arrangements to attract
alternative energy companies.
Undoubtedly we will see more of these types of partnerships in the future.