In Focus: Why Environmental Risk Assessment Is a Necessary Corporate Investment
2011 Directory
New owners of real property have a strong incentive to properly investigate potential environmental risks prior to assuming ownership. A thorough environmental investigation is necessary if there is any evidence that the property has ever been used for an industrial purpose, or if there is any suggestion that contamination exists.
Most financial lending institutions, as well as the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA), require environmental due diligence before issuing commercial loans. Additionally, it is common due diligence practice to complete an ESA to prevent future CERCLA liability for existing contamination on the property in question, even if a commercial loan is not sought.
New landowners may be liable under several environmental laws, regardless of whether the new owner played any role in causing contamination or other environmental damage in some cases. For example, a current owner or operator of a facility or property can be liable under CERCLA as a Potentially Responsible Party (PRP), regardless of whether the owner/operator played any part in the contamination.
The remediation liability and associated defense and administrative costs can be considerable, resulting in decreased market value of the asset, as well as the costs associated with investigation and cleanup. For example, a small dry cleaning facility with on-site operations can cause environmental damage resulting in soil and groundwater investigation and significant cleanup costs.
Environmental Insurance Considerations
Once property owners uncover potential environmental exposures, they can seek specialized environmental liability insurance to protect against these risks. Prudent risk management practices can be put in place to minimize these liabilities with help from environmental specialists familiar with regional and local environmental regulations, who can also protect companies from everyday operational exposures.
Some will purchase an environmentally-distressed property at a reduced price, perform the necessary remediation, and sell the property at full price. The ESA gives the key stakeholders in the asset purchase the opportunity to make informed decisions based on their risk tolerance, and to know whether the risk will exceed their pre-established risk appetite and return metrics.
Companies seeking to protect their bottom lines should ensure that environmental risk is managed in a coordinated fashion, and forms part of the organization's overall risk management framework.
Project Announcements
Apex Plastics Opens Expanded Production Plant In Brookfield, Missouri
09/22/2014
Japan-Based Bridgestone Rubber-BSA Opens Biorubber Process Research Center In Mesa, Arizona
09/22/2014
SpencerARL Expands Its Plattsburgh, New York, Manufacturing Facility
09/22/2014
Hill International, Inc. Relocates Corporate Headquarters To Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
09/22/2014
Prysmian Group Plans $8.2 Million Expansion At Abbeville County, South Carolina, Manufacturing Center
09/22/2014
Japan-Based Kowa Kentucky Plans $8.3 Million Manufacturing Facility In Corbin, Kentucky
09/22/2014
Most Read
-
19th Annual Area Development Gold and Silver Shovel Awards
Q2 2024
-
What the Latest EPA PFAS Rule Means for Site Due Diligence
Q3 2024
-
Semiconductors’ fragile relationship with water may be tested
Q3 2024
-
2023 Top States Commentary: Top-Ranked States Have What It Takes to Win Mega Projects
Q3 2023
-
2023 Top States for Doing Business Meet the Needs of Site Selectors
Q3 2023
-
2023's Leading Metro Locations: Hotspots of Economic Growth
Q4 2023
-
Mitigating Site Risks for Industrial Projects
Q3 2024