In Focus: Layoffs-Legal Protection for Employers
Nov 08
To help employers avoid lawsuits from former employees, there are a variety of recommendations that should be considered:
Provide outplacement services. Employers can go a long way toward increasing good will with just-released employees by offering to help them find alternative work. Providing some type of outplacement assistance can do more than keep things amicable among former employees and minimize the risk of future litigation - it can also alleviate fears among current employees who may be worried about their own job security.
Be aware of legal requirements. Many employers aren't familiar with the federal WARN Act, which requires covered employers to give 60 days advance notice before ordering a plant closing or mass layoff that will affect a substantial number of workers. Covered employers generally include those with at least 100 full-time employees. There are severe monetary sanctions for failing to comply with the requirements of WARN.
In addition, the federal Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act places certain important restrictions on separation agreements or severance packages involving employees who are 40 or more years old, including those involved in group layoffs - defined broadly to include layoffs of two or more employees at one time. To ensure that a layoff does not violate this act, employers should consult with an employment law attorney to make sure they have the proper language for any agreements with laid-off employees in this age group. This includes a required chart listing ages and positions within the affected department of the company, noting those included and not included in the layoff.
Review all decisions carefully. It is important to have your human resources department and legal counsel review decisions about who will be laid off and who will be retained in order to avoid claims of discrimination in the layoff selection process. This includes a review of the impact of the layoff on employees in certain age, gender, racial, ethnic, and other protected categories, as well as making sure that the company has a cogent business justification for its determinations as to who will be included in the layoff and who will not, thus closing the door on potential lawsuits stemming from claims of retaliation. There is also a risk with a layoff that the employees will be prompted to pursue other claims such as class actions for wage and hour violations. Be sure to review these factors in your decisions as well.
Olivia Goodkin and Wendy Lane are attorneys with California-based Rutter Hobbs & Davidoff Inc., a law firm that specializes in labor and employment issues; they are part of the firm's Employment Law Practice Group. Contact the authors at (310) 286-1700; visit the firm's website at www.rutterhobbs.com.
Project Announcements
Kratos Plans Somerset County, Maryland, Production Operations
01/17/2026
CesiumAstro Expands Bee Cave, Texas, Headquarters-Manufacturing Operations
01/16/2026
Johnson & Johnson Expands Wilson County, North Carolina, Production Operations
01/16/2026
Solstice Advanced Materials Expands Chesterfield County, Virginia, Manufacturing Operations
01/16/2026
TransMedics Group Plans Somerville, Massachusetts, Headquarters Operations
01/16/2026
AVAIO Digital Partners Plans Pulaski County, Arkansas, Data Center Operations
01/14/2026
Most Read
-
The Workforce Bottleneck in America’s Manufacturing Revival
Q4 2025
-
Data Centers in 2025: When Power Became the Gatekeeper
Q4 2025
-
Speed Built In—The Real Differentiator for 2026 Site Selection Projects
Q1 2026
-
Preparing for the Next USMCA Shake-Up
Q4 2025
-
Tariff Shockwaves Hit the Industrial Sector
Q4 2025
-
Investors Seek Shelter in Food-Focused Real Estate
Q3 2025
-
The New Industrial Revolution in Biotech
Q4 2025