Area Development Homepage >> Annual Reports >>

23rd Annual Corporate Survey Analysis by Ed McCallum

Ed McCallum, Senior Principal, McCallum-Sweeney (Dec/Jan 09)

Figure 9. When asked about how the downturn in the U.S. economy (up until late summer 2008) had affected their facility plans, just 24 percent of the respondents said their new facility plans had been put on hold, while 22 percent said they were still planning to open new facilities.

The 2008 Corporate Survey certainly makes a statement about the sentiments of decision-makers. Oil peaked at $147 per barrel in June of 2008, yet at the close of business six months later — on December 11 — it was $45. The U.S. government passed a $700 million bailout package for the banking industry in November, yet the U.S. Senate would not pass a similar package for the U.S. auto Industry. These are uncertain times for the U.S. and world economies, and it has had an impact on priorities in the minds of executives.

In spite of the recent volatility in the marketplace, there has not been a corresponding overreaction or concern regarding costs. Then again, perhaps there should be an overreaction.

Enlarge This Image

Enlarge to view Figure 26, site selection factors

Slideshow: 23rd Annual Corporate Survey

LINK: 23rd Annual Corporate Survey Digital Edition

Editors Picks

In a cost-conscious environment, both energy availability and costs and labor costs would typically be of major issue; however, oddly enough, concern about these factors decreased by 1.1 and 0.9 percentage points, respectively. Is this sentiment sensible given that both energy and labor costs will certainly increase — that is if history teaches us anything? I would say that it is in some ways.

There is a greater concern over training programs and proximity to technical university, both of which increased by 5.7 percentage points. This speaks volumes about the where the focus should be in order to increase competitiveness in the marketplace. It begs the reader to ask the obvious question, “Is there enough concern?” Personally, I do not think there is regarding either energy costs or worker training.

Two dramatic statistics in the survey are the increased concern for the availability of healthcare facilities (which went up more than 20 percentage points) and the decreased concern for railroad service (which declined by almost 11 percentage points), although neither of these ratings should be surprising. One only has to examine the current demographic statistics on aging to understand why healthcare is an increasingly important component of work force recruitment and retention. I suspect this will be a continuing concern for a long time.

Regarding the decreased concern for railroad service, there has been a dramatic slowdown in very large capital investments, which typically are the exact industries that require rail. Of greater significance is the lack of concern over the economies associated with rail transport and the inevitable increase in energy costs on a transportation system that is way overtaxed. This is a mistake in a time when industry should be driving policymakers to correct this inadequacy.

Sponsor Directory

California

Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD)

Georgia

George Department of Economic Development (GDEcD)

Georgia

Georgia Power

Illinois

Economic Development Corporation of Decatur & Macon County

Kansas

Greater Wichita EDC

Missouri

Joplin Area Chamber of Commerce

New Jersey

Jersey City EDC

New York

Broome County IDA/Greater Binghamton

New York

Syracuse Economic Growth Council

Ohio

Greater Akron Chamber

Ontario, Canada

Sarnia-Lambton Economic Partnership

South Carolina

Santee Cooper

South Carolina

South Carolina Power Team/Palmetto

Texas

Cedar Hill EDC

Texas

McKinney Economic Development Corporation

Texas

Texas Economic Development Corporation - Office of the Governor

LINK: 23rd Annual Corporate Survey Digital Edition

Save/Share Article

About the Author

Ed McCallum, Senior Principal, McCallum-Sweeney
Ed McCallum has 22 years of experience in site selection. Major site selection and economic development clients throughout his career at McCallum-Sweeney have included Nordex, Zarges Gmbh, PACCAR, LM Glasfiber, Weil McLain, Mistubishi, Boeing, Kasle Steel, and International Shipholding Corporation, among others.

Area Development Homepage >> Annual Reports >>

Figure 9. When asked about how the downturn in the U.S. economy (up until late summer 2008) had affected their facility plans, just 24 percent of the respondents said their new facility plans had been put on hold, while 22 percent said they were still planning to open new facilities.

Enlarge to view Figure 26, site selection factors

Sponsor Directory

About the Author

More articles by Ed McCallum

02/10/2012

02/10/2012

02/10/2012

02/10/2012

02/10/2012

02/10/2012

02/08/2012

PricewaterhouseCoopers

Jones Lang LaSalle

U.S. Department of Commerce

Jones Lang LaSalle

Grubb & Ellis

Wall Street Journal MarketWatch

IBM Global Business Services, IBM Institute for Business Value

Deloitte

The Manufacturing Institute

Area Development Magazine Special Presentation

PricewaterhouseCoopers







Privacy policy / GuidelinesArea Development will select a number of questions to answer each week. An Area Development representative will contact the submitting reader directly with feedback. Additionally, all submissions are eligible to appear online or in our print publication. If your question is selected for publication we will include and publish your first name, job title and industry only. The full identity of the submitting reader will not appear in published format.Area Development will not publish, share with any third parties, or use for marketing purposes any personal information submitted here without the express consent of the submitting reader.