Ranked #3: Corporate Tax Rate
Respondents to Area Development's 21st Annual Corporate Survey have named Corporate Tax Rate as the third most important factor in the site selection process behind only labor costs and highway accessibility.
Most businesses will be faced with a decision to expand or relocate within the United States or in a foreign location at some point in their business' growth, and that decision can be made for a variety of reasons. For some companies with labor-intensive products, locating a manufacturing facility in a location with low labor costs may enable them to be more competitive. Other companies may find it economical to locate in a place that provides a source for the raw materials they rely on, while others look for a location that can serve as both a base to serve a local market and to export to nearby markets.
Clearly, the corporate tax rate should be looked at very closely when companies compare locations in the United States for expansion or relocation, or when evaluating whether to move offshore.
The U.S. federal corporate statutory tax rate for most corporate taxpayers is 35 percent of taxable income, regardless of where a company is located within the United States. All corporate taxpayers should recognize the federal statutory tax rate and work within the Internal Revenue Code to manage their effective tax rate - the true tax rate after taking into consideration all tax adjustments (plus and minus) to income and the effect of credits, incentives, and other tax benefits. State and local statutory tax rates, on the other hand, will range from 1 percent to 12 percent.
Deciding whether to relocate or expand a manufacturing, warehouse, or other facility in one state or another requires an analysis of other principles of state and local corporate taxation beyond the statutory tax rate in order to determine the true tax costs for doing business in a particular state. Once a corporate taxpayer decides to place tangible personal property or acquire real property in a state, it will be subject to that state's income and/or franchise tax laws. The true effective tax rate, however, will depend upon how much of the business' income will be subject to tax in that state.
States are allowed to tax no more income than constitutionally permitted to be taxed. Taxable income in most states commences with federal taxable income, with state-specific modifications that add or subtract certain items from the federal taxable base, such as depreciation, interest income, net operating losses, and state taxes, to mention a few.
In addition, corporate taxpayers that commence operations in another state or states could potentially become taxable in more than one state. The question then becomes - how much income will be subject to tax by each of the states in which operations are conducted? A corporation that is taxable in more than one state has the constitutional right to have its income fairly apportioned among the states, and should not have to subject more than 100 percent of its income to the collective taxing body of states.
Accordingly, states have adopted apportionment principles to provide formulas to corporations for dividing their taxable income among all states in which a company has operations. These formulas are based on a weighted ratio of business activity within a state, which in most states consists of the property, payroll, and sales present in each state. Some states modify this formula to double weight sales, establish only single sales factors, or other such variations. Thus, apportionment may not provide a uniform division of a corporation's income among the taxing states because each state is free to choose the type of formula used to measure the corporation's business activity, resulting in some corporation's apportionment factors adding to more than 100 percent.
Companies looking to expand or relocate within the United States should, therefore, thoroughly review these state tax principles and look for states that are considered low tax states, no tax states, or states that have favorable apportionment principles. For example, locating a significant facility in terms of property and payroll in a state that uses a single sales factor method of apportioning income is particularly beneficial.
2023 Top States for Doing Business Meet the Needs of Site Selectors
The Rise of Mid-Size U.S. Cities: The Industrial Development Boom
Front Line: Brownfields Offer Redevelopment Opportunities
2023 Top States Commentary: Top-Ranked States Have What It Takes to Win Mega Projects
37th Annual Corporate Survey: Economic Pressures Exerting Greatest Effect on Decision-Makers
Immigration: A Potential Fix for Labor Shortages?
Workforce Q4 2023
2023 Top States Workforce Development Programs