In January 2014, the controversial Keystone pipeline began moving crude oil from the huge storage hub in Cushing, Oklahoma, to the Gulf Coast. The pivotal event was the completion of the Gulf Coast pipeline, the leg between Cushing, Oklahoma, and Port Arthur, Texas. This pipeline runs 487 miles and has the capacity to ship up to 830,000 barrels of oil per day.
For the first time there is now a direct link for Canadian crude oil to the Gulf refineries. The original Keystone pipeline (Phase 1 of the project) originates from Hardisty, Alberta, through Regina, Saskatchewan, and into Manitoba before crossing the border into North Dakota then through South Dakota and into the oil terminals in Steele City, Nebraska. From there the Canadian crude oil originally went to Patoka and Wood River, Illinois. A spokesman for TransCanada Corp. reported “some 550 million barrels of oil have been shipped via pipeline into Patoka and Wood River since the pipeline became operational in 2010.”
The second phase of the Keystone pipeline was the completion of the 300-mile leg from Steele City to Cushing, Oklahoma. Finally, in late January of this year, the Gulf Coast Pipeline Project went operational and Canadian crude oil moved from Cushing to Nederland, Texas.
Even without approval of the controversial Keystone XL phase, which would transport oil on a far shorter route from Hardisty through Montana, South Dakota, and into Steele City, Canadian crude oil is now flowing through the pipeline from Canada to the Gulf. TransCanada expects the Gulf Coast pipeline to transport 700,000 barrels of oil per day. The Gulf Coast line forms the southern leg of TransCanada’s controversial Keystone XL project, which has been waiting for five years for approval from the Obama administration.
“We are now actually connected all the way to the Gulf Coast,” said TransCanada Corp. CEO Russ Girling. “The shippers (on the Keystone line) have the ability to not only deliver at Cushing, they can deliver right through to the Gulf Coast. “
In addition to the opening of the Gulf Coast pipeline, there have been major developments with regard to Keystone XL. In early February, the State Department released its latest report on the proposed XL pipeline. The report found that the pipeline’s construction would create as many as 3,900 jobs over two years. The additional spending on construction material would push the job gain up to 4,200 — counting jobs building the pipeline. More importantly, the report found that the construction of the pipeline would not harm the environment.
This final environmental review by the U.S. State Department further found that the Keystone XL pipeline would not greatly increase carbon emissions because the oil sands in Alberta would be developed anyway. And, according to an article in Forbes, “Environmental risks from hypothetical future pipeline spills need to be weighed relative to what is likely to happen if the oil travels by an alternative pipeline across Canada or by train south into the U.S.
” It’s noted that there have been six accidents in the past year involving trains carrying oil.
The study is important because President Obama has said he would not approve Keystone XL if it would exacerbate carbon pollution. Now, according to Bloomberg, “The pipeline’s fate comes down to the broader questions about whether the project is in the U.S. national interest, weighing matters such as energy needs and diplomatic relations.