Corporate Executive Survey Analysis: Media Trend of Onshoring Seems to be a Non-Issue for Most Corporations
The media trend of onshoring, however, seems to be a non-issue for most corporations participating in this survey. Despite the media coverage, 97 percent of the respondents do not expect to relocate a foreign facility back to the United States.
Winter 2012
Moving up on the list of site selection factors is the hotly contested issue of right-to-work. As I sit in my office overlooking downtown Indianapolis, the state of Indiana just voted to become the 23rd right-to-work state in the nation. This issue, as a site selection factor, jumped 9.6 percentage points, moving from 16th to 12th on the list, and is likely to be a trend companies and site selectors continue to monitor.
The media trend of onshoring, however, seems to be a non-issue for most corporations participating in this survey. Despite the media coverage, 97 percent of the respondents do not expect to relocate a foreign facility back to the United States. However, the survey does not determine how many of these companies have foreign facilities. In addition, 98 percent do not expect to relocate a domestic facility offshore either. Without further investigation, it is difficult to determine how many of the respondents to the survey have existing offshore facilities to even consider bringing them onshore.
Tied for second place on the list of site selection factors is availability of skilled labor, up from seventh place the prior year. Respondents say that high unemployment rates are not making it easier to find the labor their companies need (67 percent), and 43 percent say the unemployed are lacking both basic skills (reading comprehension and mathematical competency) and advanced skills (job-specific, technology-related, and specialized). Interestingly, training programs and proximity to technical college/training, as factors in the site selection process, rank near the bottom of the list - a 26-year trend.
Overall, the results are expected. Most corporations state economic instability (65 percent) as the top reason that they are not spending more of their earnings on investment in U.S. facilities. If they are relocating, high taxes are stated as the number-one reason behind the relocation, and the investment amount in new domestic facilities hovers under $10 million. With these corporations not confident that the economy will recover until 2014 (43 percent), it is presumable that we will continue to see actions that can result in the lowering of operating costs and labor costs, until something that resembles more traditional economic growth returns to the United States.
Project Announcements
Eli Lilly and Company Expands Lebanon, Indiana, Operations
10/09/2024
Johnson & Johnson Plans Wilson, North Carolina, Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Operations
10/08/2024
O’Neal Manufacturing Services Plans Kingsport Tennessee, Steel Fabrication Operations
10/07/2024
Germany-Based ZEISS Expands Chesterfield, Missouri, Research-Production Operations
10/04/2024
Piramal Pharma Solutions Expands Lexington, Kentucky, Operations
10/04/2024
G&H Decoys Plans Corning, Arkansas, Headquarters-Manufacturing Operations
10/04/2024
Most Read
-
Top States for Doing Business in 2024: A Continued Legacy of Excellence
Q3 2024
-
Cold Storage: The Next Big Thing in Industrial Real Estate
Q3 2024
-
What the Latest EPA PFAS Rule Means for Site Due Diligence
Q3 2024
-
2023 Top States for Doing Business Meet the Needs of Site Selectors
Q3 2023
-
2023's Leading Metro Locations: Hotspots of Economic Growth
Q4 2023
-
Mitigating Site Risks for Industrial Projects
Q3 2024
-
The Challenge of Securing Sufficient Electrical Power for Battery Cell Plants
Q3 2024