Corporate Executive Survey Analysis: Media Trend of Onshoring Seems to be a Non-Issue for Most Corporations
The media trend of onshoring, however, seems to be a non-issue for most corporations participating in this survey. Despite the media coverage, 97 percent of the respondents do not expect to relocate a foreign facility back to the United States.
Winter 2012
Moving up on the list of site selection factors is the hotly contested issue of right-to-work. As I sit in my office overlooking downtown Indianapolis, the state of Indiana just voted to become the 23rd right-to-work state in the nation. This issue, as a site selection factor, jumped 9.6 percentage points, moving from 16th to 12th on the list, and is likely to be a trend companies and site selectors continue to monitor.
The media trend of onshoring, however, seems to be a non-issue for most corporations participating in this survey. Despite the media coverage, 97 percent of the respondents do not expect to relocate a foreign facility back to the United States. However, the survey does not determine how many of these companies have foreign facilities. In addition, 98 percent do not expect to relocate a domestic facility offshore either. Without further investigation, it is difficult to determine how many of the respondents to the survey have existing offshore facilities to even consider bringing them onshore.
Tied for second place on the list of site selection factors is availability of skilled labor, up from seventh place the prior year. Respondents say that high unemployment rates are not making it easier to find the labor their companies need (67 percent), and 43 percent say the unemployed are lacking both basic skills (reading comprehension and mathematical competency) and advanced skills (job-specific, technology-related, and specialized). Interestingly, training programs and proximity to technical college/training, as factors in the site selection process, rank near the bottom of the list - a 26-year trend.
Overall, the results are expected. Most corporations state economic instability (65 percent) as the top reason that they are not spending more of their earnings on investment in U.S. facilities. If they are relocating, high taxes are stated as the number-one reason behind the relocation, and the investment amount in new domestic facilities hovers under $10 million. With these corporations not confident that the economy will recover until 2014 (43 percent), it is presumable that we will continue to see actions that can result in the lowering of operating costs and labor costs, until something that resembles more traditional economic growth returns to the United States.
Project Announcements
Pratt Industries Plans York County, South Carolina, Manufacturing Operations
10/15/2025
MMR Group Plans Lafayette Parish, Louisiana, Assembly Operations
10/14/2025
J.M. Smucker-Hostess Brands Expand Columbus, Georgia, Production Operations
10/14/2025
DMR Technologies Plans Lafayette Parish, Louisiana, Manufacturing Operations
10/14/2025
Swiss-Based Hitachi Energy Expands Varennes, Canada, Operations
10/14/2025
Underwood Ammo Plans Effingham County, Georgia, Manufacturing Operations
10/14/2025
Most Read
-
2025’s Top States for Business: How the Winners Are Outpacing the Rest
Q3 2025
-
Tariffs, Talent, and U.S. Expansion
Q3 2025
-
The Compliance Reckoning Is Here
Q3 2025
-
Around the Horn: Data Center Supply Chains — What's Next?
Q3 2025
-
Data Center Demand Stabilizes Amid Changing Market Forces
Q3 2025
-
Powering the Next Generation of Projects
Q3 2025
-
How Consumer Trends Are Reshaping Food Facilities
Q3 2025