Corporate Executive Survey Analysis: Media Trend of Onshoring Seems to be a Non-Issue for Most Corporations
The media trend of onshoring, however, seems to be a non-issue for most corporations participating in this survey. Despite the media coverage, 97 percent of the respondents do not expect to relocate a foreign facility back to the United States.
Winter 2012
Moving up on the list of site selection factors is the hotly contested issue of right-to-work. As I sit in my office overlooking downtown Indianapolis, the state of Indiana just voted to become the 23rd right-to-work state in the nation. This issue, as a site selection factor, jumped 9.6 percentage points, moving from 16th to 12th on the list, and is likely to be a trend companies and site selectors continue to monitor.
The media trend of onshoring, however, seems to be a non-issue for most corporations participating in this survey. Despite the media coverage, 97 percent of the respondents do not expect to relocate a foreign facility back to the United States. However, the survey does not determine how many of these companies have foreign facilities. In addition, 98 percent do not expect to relocate a domestic facility offshore either. Without further investigation, it is difficult to determine how many of the respondents to the survey have existing offshore facilities to even consider bringing them onshore.
Tied for second place on the list of site selection factors is availability of skilled labor, up from seventh place the prior year. Respondents say that high unemployment rates are not making it easier to find the labor their companies need (67 percent), and 43 percent say the unemployed are lacking both basic skills (reading comprehension and mathematical competency) and advanced skills (job-specific, technology-related, and specialized). Interestingly, training programs and proximity to technical college/training, as factors in the site selection process, rank near the bottom of the list - a 26-year trend.
Overall, the results are expected. Most corporations state economic instability (65 percent) as the top reason that they are not spending more of their earnings on investment in U.S. facilities. If they are relocating, high taxes are stated as the number-one reason behind the relocation, and the investment amount in new domestic facilities hovers under $10 million. With these corporations not confident that the economy will recover until 2014 (43 percent), it is presumable that we will continue to see actions that can result in the lowering of operating costs and labor costs, until something that resembles more traditional economic growth returns to the United States.
Project Announcements
Titan Mechanical Plans Defiance, Ohio, Fabrication Operations
06/12/2025
Ireland-Based Linde Plans Brownsville, Texas, Operations
06/12/2025
Canadian-Based Torvan Medical Plans High Point, North Carolina, Headquarters-Production Operations
06/12/2025
Amazon Web Services Plans Richmond County, North Carolina, Operations
06/12/2025
Rolls-Royce Expands Mankato, Minnesota, Manufacturing Operations
06/12/2025
StandardAero Component Services Expands Sharonville, Ohio, MRO Operations
06/12/2025
Most Read
-
First Person: Joe Capes, CEO, LiquidStack
Q2 2025
-
The Legal Limits of DEI in Incentives Agreements, Hiring, and Contracting
Q2 2025
-
39th Annual Corporate & 21st Annual Consultants Surveys: What Business Leaders and Consultants Are Saying About Site Selection
Q1 2025
-
Top States for Doing Business in 2024: A Continued Legacy of Excellence
Q3 2024
-
Get Your Mega Site ‘Project Ready’
Q2 2025
-
Navigating the new era of SCIF construction
Q1 2025
-
Why Cold Storage May Defy the Tariff Crunch
Q2 2025