In Focus: Nature’s Cleanup Crew - Peace of Mind for Site Managers
New advancements in the application of biological treatments and analytical technologies are reducing redevelopment and remediation risks at formerly contaminated sites.
Q3 / Summer 2013
That’s all changed, thanks to the application of biological treatments and intrinsic bioremediation — that is, naturally occurring contaminant-degrading microbes — as a “polishing” technology to complete remediation. Biological approaches to remediation usually include adding oxygen or a microbial food source to stimulate naturally occurring bacterial bioprocesses that destroy a specific contaminant. Environmental firms increasingly are using these techniques at later remediation stages to augment traditional remediation methods. Not only are these new techniques reducing redevelopment risks, but they can also help justify no further action or site closures.
Executives responsible for site selection and management can have ongoing peace of mind, too. As low contamination levels may still be present at a “remediated” site, executives and stakeholders are reassured that biological cleanup will continue to destroy harmful contaminants as long as necessary. This knowledge can ease the concerns that come along with redevelopment and recycling of land resources. Here is a look at the analytical technologies behind this peace-of-mind.
Environmental Molecular Diagnostics (EMDs)
During the past decade, bio-scientists have developed new analytical methods called Environmental Molecular Diagnostics (EMDs). EMDs directly measure various biochemical components of microbes. These tests, which consist of a collection of nucleic-acid (DNA)-based tools that analyze environmental samples, provide clues called biomarkers, which inform environmental professionals about current and future site contaminant degradation. Other EMDs can also help pinpoint the source of contamination. EMD techniques can be more accurate and cost-effective than traditional methods in assessing in situ biodegradation for sites in the final stages of remediation. While EMDs don’t take the place of traditional contaminant analysis, they supplement environmental data sets by providing key information previously not accessible by other tests.
The most popular EMD test among environmental practitioners is the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay. The qPCR test allows professionals to directly detect and quantify microbial genes from the environment. They can determine direct evidence of the microbe’s contaminant degrading activity at a particular site through the presence and relative quantities of various genes in soil or groundwater.
For example, for an organization considering redeveloping a remediated site that exhibits low-level contamination, the environmental engineer could apply EMDs like the qPCR test to check if microbes capable of “polishing off” the remaining contaminant are present and active. If the qPCR test shows high levels of contaminant degrading microbes, this would serve as evidence that contaminant removal is likely to continue. If, on the other hand, the test shows low numbers of contaminant degrading microbes, the organization would know that they may need to consider more active remediation alternatives before undertaking redevelopment.
At this time, there are several specific qPCR assays for various contaminants such as gasoline, solvents, and metals. This list will grow, and with it the significance of EMDs to the redevelopment and environmental management process. EMDs can provide critical knowledge of how effectively nature is cleaning up and reclaiming formerly contaminated sites. This information can in turn provide stakeholders with a level of comfort when proceeding with redevelopment of a contaminated or formally contaminated site.
Recent Project Announcements
Janicki Industries Plans Great Falls, Montana, Manufacturing Operations
06/13/2026
Urban Outfitters Plans Bucks County, Pennsylvania, Operations
06/13/2026
Raytheon Expands Portsmouth, Rhode Island, Missile Defense Operations
06/13/2026
Luxembourg-Based ArcelorMittal Building Solutions Plans Macon-Bibb County, Operations
06/13/2026
South Korean-Based Kamtec Auto USA Plans Auburn, Alabama, Manufacturing Operations
06/12/2026
NovaSpark Energy Expands West Monroe-Establishes Houma, Louisiana, Operations
06/11/2026
Austria-Based Mosdorfer Plans Oconee, South Carolina, Manufacturing Operations
06/11/2026
Red Metals Plans North Charleston, South Carolina, Manufacturing Operations
06/11/2026
LiCAP Technologies Expands Sacramento, California, Manufacturing Operations
06/11/2026
South Korea-Based Soulbrain RASA TX Plans Taylor, Texas, Production-Headquarters Operations
06/11/2026
MSolar Manufacturing Plans Shenandoah County, Virginia, Operations
06/09/2026
Green Fuels Operating Plans Stephens County, Oklahoma, Refinery Operations
06/09/2026
Integer Technologies Expands Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Research Operations
06/09/2026
USA Rare Earth Plans Blacksburg, South Carolina, Production Operations
06/08/2026
Most Read
-
Where Workforce Capacity Is Being Built — and Where It’s Being Deployed
Q1 2026
-
40th Annual Corporate and 22nd Annual Consultant Site Selection Survey Results
Q1 2026
-
2025’s Top States for Business: How the Winners Are Outpacing the Rest
Q3 2025
-
The Workforce Bottleneck in America’s Manufacturing Revival
Q4 2025
-
How AI Is Reshaping the Way Communities Compete for Investment
Q2 2026
-
What Does “Site Readiness” Really Mean?
Q1 2026
-
Phillip Morris International Starting Building Before Plans
Q1 2026