Last Word: The CHIPS Act
How is the Chips Act driving investment in the U.S., and how can local initiatives help?
In the late 1980s and 1990s, semiconductor companies became early investors in offshoring their assembly and manufacturing plants to lower cost locations, mostly in eastern Asia. Land, taxes, and government regulations were among several reasons why offshoring became so cost-effective, along with the chips’ high value-to-weight ratio, making them easy to import back to the U.S. The U.S. simply could not compete with foreign government subsidies. As a result, only 10 percent of today’s world chip supply is produced in the U.S., despite being invented domestically.
How is The CHIPS Act driving investment in the U.S., and how can local initiatives help? The CHIPS Act reinvigorates U.S. semiconductor strategy and creates a federal landscape in which the industry can potentially afford to reinvest in the U.S. This is imperative to advance future projects and increase domestic production, as supply chain disruptions continue to plague U.S. OEMs and foreign manufacturing becomes more unreliable. As federal support continues to drive additional investment in the semiconductor industry, it is important for state and local governments to come to the table as well.
Dynamics between the federal, state, and local levels are of vital importance in leveraging federal investment. More specifically, it is paramount that state and local entities demonstrate a united front on their position as it relates to the CHIPS Act. For those locations seeking to attract the sector, state and local elected officials may do well to indicate a clear commitment to the semiconductor industry, first and foremost by noting their support of the CHIPS Act. This may be demonstrated through mechanisms such as writing a letter of support or showing a willingness to move at the speed of the industry.
Some additional examples of this commitment may include regular communications between officials and OEMs/suppliers, for example by assembling a semiconductor task force to advocate on their behalf at the federal level. Further, state and local governments may offer incentives, like a long-term tax credit or workforce investment program, or provide an ombudsman to assist current and new semiconductor companies with items such as talent identification and permitting. Finally, states and localities may invest in their educational systems by such means as creating relevant training programs, ultimately building an ecosystem around the industry. The CHIPS Act creates a federal landscape in which the industry can potentially afford to reinvest in the U.S.
The CHIPS Act has provided the U.S. with an exceptional opportunity for domestic investment through the semiconductor industry. Additionally, this legislation may serve as a gateway to increase investment and encourage even more domestic production in adjacent industries. Federal, state, and local initiatives will become more important than ever in advancing future projects as companies begin to draft and submit their CHIPS Act applications and the true impact of this legislation comes to fruition.
Liesel Schmader is a senior consultant in Deloitte’s Location Strategy practice. She has experience advising corporate clients across industries, including the semiconductor industry, on global and domestic site selection. Liesel received a Juris Doctorate from The Ohio State University and a Bachelor of Arts from Miami University. Addison Collins is a consultant in Deloitte’s Real Estate Strategy and Sustainability practice. She has worked several large semiconductor mega-fabrication site selections in the U.S. and continues to advise in the industry. Addison received a Bachelor of Science from Virginia Tech. Sarah Raehl is a senior manager in Deloitte’s Real Estate Strategy and Sustainability practice. She has over 17 years of experience advising companies in their facility and location strategy decisions to enable alignment of organizational, human, and physical assets with corporate strategies and geographies. Sarah received an MBA from the University of Michigan and a Bachelor of Science from the University of Notre Dame.
LEGO Group Plans Chesterfield County, Virginia, Manufacturing Plant
Scotland-Based PowerPhotonic Plans Sahuarita, Arizona, U.S. Headquarters-Production Campus
A. Duie Pyle Plans Manassas-Richmond-Roanoke, Virginia, Cross Dock Service Centers
Black Buffalo 3D Corporation Relocates-Plans Smithfield Township, Pennsylvania, Manufacturing Complex
Cooperative Response Establishes Kirksville, Missouri, Operations Center
Austria-Based Kostwein Plans Greenville, South Carolina, Manufacturing Facility
37th Annual Corporate Survey: Economic Pressures Exerting Greatest Effect on Decision-Makers
Is a Flurry of Fads Shaping Economic Development Policy?
Nearshoring — North America’s Next Factory
19th Annual Consultants Survey: Clients Challenged by Tight Labor Market, Energy Availability
First Person: Labor Crunch in the Construction Industry
Front Line: Water Supply Increasingly Affecting Location Decisions
Manufacturing and Distribution Trends Impact the Value of Credits and Incentives