Factoring Energy into a Location Decision
The current economic slowdown presents an opportunity for companies to assess energy costs and reliability at their present location.
Apr/May 09
operations.
A Look at 2008
For much of 2008, the public's attention was focused on rising prices at the pump. In July, the average retail price of a gallon of gas peaked at $4.10, and - while it was anticipated that such costs would ease in the long term - there was little expectation that they would fall to $1.64 per gallon by December '08. This price volatility, however, was not as evident among other energy sources, particularly electricity. On average, for the entire U.S., electrical rates rose by less than 5 percent in 2008. This was a comparatively low increase - in terms of future rate sustainability - given the increases in price of electric generators' hydrocarbon inputs: crude oil increased by almost 40 percent, natural gas by 28 percent, and coal by 11 percent during this same period. Electricity costs are, in fact, generally less responsive to input price volatility due to market regulation and controls.
By the summer of 2008, the economy began to hint at slowing demand. As production slowed to accommodate a shrinking market, so did companies' energy consumption. Many companies, particularly manufacturers, may have shifted their efforts to manage fixed costs rather than variable costs; though machines sat idle, workers' wages, occupancy expenses, and property taxes held steady. Anecdotal evidence of this shift could be the now ubiquitous layoffs across the economy.
Thus, the reduced importance of energy availability and costs may be a factor of:
• Comparatively low increase in electrical rates - For manufacturers where electricity comprises less than 10 percent of the overall operating costs (e.g., food manufacturers), the average increase of 5 percent in electrical rates was not dramatic and would likely not have garnered as much weighting in the survey as a potential 5 percent increase in labor costs or taxes.
• Slowing demand due to economic recession - It is understandable that companies could see energy - especially electricity - as a manageable cost that would reduce with slowing demand and comprise a smaller proportion of overall operating costs. Fixed costs, on the other hand, would be unchanged by the downturn and may become a greater cost burden on businesses.
Existing vs. New Locations
It is also vital to distinguish the importance of energy when examining existing operations and when searching for a new location. Existing, sizable energy consumers that have a consistent load cause few unexpected demand surprises to local utilities. These consumers already have the infrastructure in place and may be exposed to lower and less volatile electricity and natural gas rates. When searching for a new site, however, it is imperative to examine both the reliability of the existing infrastructure and offered electrical rates for future cost savings.
While average manufacturing labor costs may vary ~20 percent between states, electrical rates have a much wider range of cost deviation. According to the Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2009 report, average electrical rates for industry consumers can vary between $0.039 and $0.14 per kWh in the continental United States. For sizable manufacturers with electrical demands of 10 MW or greater, these rate differentials can result in significant annual cost impacts. In addition, energy availability and costs are bound to gain in importance as operations increase their dependence on manufacturing automation including robotics, process controls, and data management. These factors require electric reliability; volatile electrical rates can cause significant operational cost variation.
Thus, when deciding on a new investment location, it is vital to confirm the existence of readily available infrastructure that can support the required capacities. Existing infrastructure can lower the project's one-time costs and allow it to meet its timeline. Global shortages in certain energy infrastructure (e.g., substation transformers) can cause long wait times and delay plant start-up.
Project Announcements
Dana Canada Corporation Expands Oakville-Cambridge, Ontario, Canada, Operations
12/04/2023
Sparta Metal Processing Expands White County, Tennessee, Operations
12/01/2023
Walinga USA Expands Wayland, Michigan, Operations
12/01/2023
Amkor Technology Plans Peoria, Arizona, Advanced Packaging-Test Facility
12/01/2023
Dai Nippon Printing Plans Linwood, North Carolina, Lithium-ion Manufacturing Operations
11/29/2023
Axle Logistics Expands Knoxville, Tennessee, Operations
11/29/2023
Most Read
-
2023 Top States for Doing Business Meet the Needs of Site Selectors
Q3 2023
-
The Rise of Mid-Size U.S. Cities: The Industrial Development Boom
Q3 2023
-
Front Line: Brownfields Offer Redevelopment Opportunities
Q4 2023
-
2023 Top States Commentary: Top-Ranked States Have What It Takes to Win Mega Projects
Q3 2023
-
37th Annual Corporate Survey: Economic Pressures Exerting Greatest Effect on Decision-Makers
Q1 2023
-
2023 Top States Workforce Development Programs
Q3 2023
-
Immigration: A Potential Fix for Labor Shortages?
Workforce Q4 2023