Breaking Free of Intermodal Gridlock
New models in intermodal shipping are creating regionalized opportunities in inland and rural markets.
Just as containerized shipping itself was a response to inefficiencies and high cost, so is the next wave in intermodal shipping - the movement away (but not too far away) from crowded big city intermodal facilities. Since the beginning of the new millennium, "next generation" container yards have been showing up in relatively rural locations, sometimes as "build-it-and-they-will-come" projects, but more often as a response to a strategic alliance of factors. An underserved market, frustration with congestion in major hubs, proximity to rail and highways, and the presence of existing rail-served facilities - or, more likely, the combination of several of these - is driving today's new intermodal hubs.
It was just over 50 years ago that this revolutionary way of moving cargo was born. The moment was well-documented when Malcolm McLean, the founder of McLean Trucking and later Sea-Land, loaded 58 truck trailers onto his converted World War II tanker ship, the SS Ideal X, at the Port of Newark, New Jersey. On April 26, 1956, the ship set sail down the East Coast, around Florida, to the Port of Houston and into the record books as the first documented containerized cargo shipment that didn't require the muscle power of hundreds of longshoremen.
Containerization wasn't embraced enthusiastically immediately after that first shipment. In fact, as Marc Levinson writes in his book, The Box: How the Shipping Container Made the World Smaller and the World Economy Bigger, it wasn't until the rapid troop buildup in Vietnam in 1965 that containerized shipping came into its own. In response to the Pentagon's request, McLean won a $70 million contract to move material to Vietnam by container. The success of that venture proved that the increase in efficiency would be well worth the millions of dollars required to invest in specialized cranes, new port facilities and rail infrastructure to make the system work on a large scale. And it has worked. Research by Oakland-based Matson Navigation Company indicates in 1959 the shipping industry could load and unload a little over a half-ton of cargo per man-hour using traditional "break-bulk" methods where hundreds of longshoremen muscled individual items into and out of cargo ship holds. By 1976, with container shipping well underway, that six-tenths of a ton per man-hour had exploded to 4,234 tons per man-hour. A ship's time in port had shrunk from three weeks to just 18 hours.
Today's huge container ships, capable of carrying 6,000 containers or 40,000 tons at a time (the next generation may carry as many as 10,000 boxes), guarantee even greater efficiency in mixed cargo transit. But the growth in container volume that mirrors the growth in global trade creates its own problems that threaten to undermine the efficiency containers were designed to eliminate.
The Rural Solution
Too many containers arriving too quickly tax the capacity of big container ports like Long Beach, Calif.; Newark, N.J.; and Hampton Roads, Va. And inland rail hubs like Chicago, where six Class I railroads converge, are feeling the strain as well. "It can take as long to get across town in Chicago as it does to move across the country," says A. Michael Knemeyer, Ph.D., assistant professor of logistics at Ohio State University. "We've seen a lot of discussion about smaller satellite intermodal terminals driven by congestion at some of the bigger facilities."
The discussion has recently turned into reality in Marion, Ohio. Schneider National Inc., the Green Bay, Wisconsin-based trucking firm, has combined with CSX Intermodal, the Kansas City Southern railroad, and the Marion Industrial Center to create a dedicated intermodal service into and out of the Ohio Valley region. Unlike most intermodal terminals run by the railroads, this is the first operated by a truckload carrier, according to a Schneider news release announcing the new service.
"This gives our customers seamless service no matter the mode of transport," says Scott Arves, president of the transportation sector at Schneider National. Arves is hoping to tap what he considers an underserved intermodal market within 150 miles of Marion. He believes major customers - like Whirlpool, which makes 20,000 dryers a day in Marion and washers in Clyde, Ohio, or Proctor and Gamble, which makes Tide detergent in nearby Lima, Ohio - will use the new Marion service to bypass the congested Chicago ramps. "With this service, we can shorten the transit time to the West Coast and cut costs in our customers' supply chains," says Arves.
Bill Matheson, Schneider's general manager for intermodal services, says it is a combination of factors that makes Marion work as an intermodal hub. "We can reach markets like Detroit, Toledo, Cleveland, Columbus, Dayton, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh, and Indianapolis easily from Marion," says Matheson. "Being able to shorten the dray saves fuel and is easier on drivers who can make the round trip and be home in the evening."
Another huge factor in the Marion project was the fact that most of the infrastructure for the new facility was already in place. The Marion Industrial Center was built as a supply depot during World War II. Ted Graham, its president, bought the 275-acre facility in 1989 and has spent the years since improving the 1.5 million square feet of buildings and upgrading the eight miles of rail track through the facility. To accommodate Schneider, Graham upgraded the rail spur into his facility and acquired a 100-ton Mi-Jack crane that now straddles two mile-long tracks where unit trains carrying up to 150 containers will park every morning.
"We're thrilled to work with Schneider to bring intermodal service to Marion," he says. "Since it was constructed, this facility has served strategic logistics functions and will now continue that role with the introduction of modern intermodal capabilities. We've put millions into improvements at the Marion Industrial Center, so that today, with eight miles of rail here, ample buildings, and greenfield space in and near the center, we're prepared to serve any customer's needs."
Serving similar functions as the new Marion facility are intermodal centers in Rochelle and Joliet, Illinois. Rochelle's $181 million, two-square-mile "Global III" intermodal center is operated by the Union Pacific Railroad. Close to the intersection of I-88 and I-39, the Global III center has helped Rochelle land distribution centers for retailers Target and Lowe's. Just like Marion's proximity to Ohio Valley markets, truckers leaving Rochelle, population 9,500, can reach major metro areas like Chicago, Milwaukee, Rockford, Davenport, and Indianapolis in a one-day out-and-back trip, according to Jason Anderson, Rochelle's economic development director. "With fuel costs high and getting higher and the shortage of truck drivers, that's a big deal," says Anderson.
At 621 acres, Joliet's ramp is run by Burlington Northern Santa Fe. Like Rochelle and Marion, the Center Point Properties Joliet facility also allows intermodal traffic to bypass the busy Chicago ramps. The Joliet terminal is, like Marion, a former defense depot. Upgrading the Joliet Army Ammunition Manufacturing Plant to a modern intermodal terminal cost $148 million. In its first year of operation 80,000 containers were moved at Joliet. Center Point officials say the facility can perform 1.2 million lifts a year when completely built out.
A Site Selector’s Checklist for Locating in the U.S.
Location USA 2019
What Should High-Growth Companies Look for in a Community?
Where to Invest in the Booming Aerospace Manufacturing Industry
2019 Auto/Aero Site Guide
A Changing Food Manufacturing Industry
2017 Food Processing
33rd Annual Corporate Survey & the 15th Annual Consultants Survey
The Trade War and Its Impact on the Location Decision Process