Talent Shortage Emerges as No. 1 Employer Concern
3-1-2008
Nearly three-quarters of the 413 U.S. human resources professionals surveyed cited talent as their top concern. Meanwhile, 71 percent identified cost containment of health care as a top five concern this year, dropping from 80 percent last year. Other leading issues are the willingness of employees to pay for an increasing portion of benefit plan coverage and to manage their own reward budget (58 percent), clear alignment of total rewards strategy with business strategy and brand (56 percent), and demonstrating appropriate return on investment for reward expenditures (42 percent).
"Clearly, talent management is the top organizational challenge < higher than managing the cost of total rewards, especially health care," said Tim Phoenix, a principal in Deloitte's Human Capital service area and co-director of the survey. "We find that HR organizations around the world are becoming increasingly business-driven and strategic, shifting their focus from HR administration and cost reduction to long-term ROI and growth in a way that directly impacts the bottom line."
Responding to questions from an employee perspective, survey respondents pointed to economic security in retirement and financial growth opportunities before retirement as primary areas of concern.
Forty-two percent of respondents cited the "ability to afford retirement, including post-retirement health care," as the most important area of concern to them, while "ability to earn additional rewards that allow oneself to stay on top of inflation and advance in real economic terms" was cited by 26 percent.
A pattern of growing personal concern over these "big ticket" economic items is replacing angst about "my cost of health care benefits," which has slid from the biggest worry of 20 percent of survey respondents in 2005, to only eight percent in 2008.
Even though respondents' personal concerns were clearly about retirement, when asked to name their top total rewards challenges for their organization, only two percent mentioned "the cost of providing retirement benefits to employees," and a mere one percent picked "the ability of our employees to retire."
"This disconnect between what employees need or want and what employers are doing in the area of total rewards can be detrimental to the financial performance of an organization, especially as talent challenges become increasingly acute," cautions Philip A. Grisafi, CEBS and 2008 ISCEBS president. "Employers are still struggling to find that magic formula for controlling costs while retaining and motivating their employees."
In hopes of finding that balance, according to the survey respondents, companies are abandoning the traditional vertical "corporate ladder" approach and are addressing their long-term work force needs through a more flexible "lattice" employment model. This new framework can enable workers to customize their careers and move smoothly across a widening range of job options and structures.
Methodology
Conducted since 1994, this year's survey was completed online by 413 respondents in December 2007 and January 2008. As in prior years, respondents represent a diverse cross-section of the U.S.-based employer universe by industry and size.
Project Announcements
Delta Star Expands Lynchburg, Virginia, Manufacturing Operations
04/21/2025
Gillespie Precast Plans Asheboro, North Carolina, Manufacturing Operations
04/21/2025
Japan-Based TMEIC Corporation Americas Plans Waller County, Texas, Manufacturing Operations
04/21/2025
South Korea-Based Samkwang Plans Tuskegee, Alabama, Operations
04/21/2025
CRH Plans Roswell, Georgia, Operations
04/21/2025
GE Aerospace Expands Batesville, Mississippi, Manufacturing Operations
04/20/2025
Most Read
-
Run a Job Task Analysis
Q4 2024
-
The Location Economics of Advanced Nuclear
Q1 2025
-
39th Annual Corporate & 21st Annual Consultants Surveys: What Business Leaders and Consultants Are Saying About Site Selection
Q1 2025
-
NEW NIMBYism: A Threat to The U.S. Economy
Q4 2024
-
Power, Policy, and Site Selection in 2025
Q1 2025
-
Designing Beyond the Assembly Line
Q1 2025
-
Why Workforce Readiness Can’t Wait
Q1 2025