The Importance of Lease Administration
Jun/Jul 07
In large organizations, lease administrators are responsible for ensuring the accurate administration of millions of dollars each month. Thousands of transactions - including rent, real estate taxes, property insurance, common area charges, tenant improvement allowance reconciliation and recovery, and sublease payments - must be processed accurately. If the information in a lease administrator's database is inaccurate, the risks are substantial.
• Unintended lease renewals: Missed notification dates could result in unintended lease renewals; in some areas of the world such as the United Kingdom and other parts of Europe, 25-year leases are commonplace, so unintended lease renewals have the potential to create obligations worth millions.
• Payment delays: Inaccurate or delayed payments and notifications can result in penalties and incremental premiums to accommodate damages.
• Compliance challenges: Inaccurate reporting and insufficient controls could result in errors within financial statements significant enough to trigger penalties under Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley.
Some risks can be easily mitigated. Technology that is specific to lease administration is now available to ensure accurate, integrated, and automated data. Notices can be automated and information can be validated and shared companywide. With new imaging technology, leases can be scanned, imported into databases, shared by many administrators, and automatically verified for correctness. Software systems can notify administrators of key dates for required actions. Nonetheless, policies and processes must be in place to support accurate data input and maintenance, valid reporting, and follow-through on notices received. With these measures in place, companies can administer leases effectively and demonstrate that appropriate controls are in place to ensure the accuracy of financial information provided.
An alternative is to outsource the entire lease administration function. Suppliers invest substantially in technologies and platforms to deliver these services. They provide centralized expertise, leverage their expertise across multiple organizations, and take advantage of labor arbitrage offshore. They offer competitive prices and enable organizations to pay for only the level of service required as their portfolio sizes and needs change. By contrast, in-house delivery models can be more difficult to scale.
Whether an organization chooses to outsource or handle lease administration internally, the risk remains with the organization. The first and most important step is to recognize the level of risk and develop an effective plan to address it.
Scott Tibbo is managing director of Expense Management Solutions, Inc., a strategic advisory firm that specializes in helping clients deliver corporate real estate functions effectively. Mr. Tibbo can be reached at (508) 460-7014; visit the company's website at www.expensemanagement.com.
Project Announcements
Bosch Expands Lincolnton, North Carolina, Operations
06/02/2023
Little Leaf Farms Establishes McAdoo, Pennsylvania, Greens Production Complex
06/02/2023
Swiss-Based Sulzer Pumps Solutions Plans Easley, South Carolina, Operations
06/01/2023
Finland-Based ADMARES Plans Waycross, Georgia, U.S. Manufacturing Plant
06/01/2023
Toyota Plans Georgetown, Kentucky, Electric Vehicle Operations
06/01/2023
Ranger Design Establishes North Charleston, South Carolina, Operations
05/31/2023
Most Read
-
37th Annual Corporate Survey: Economic Pressures Exerting Greatest Effect on Decision-Makers
Q1 2023
-
Is a Flurry of Fads Shaping Economic Development Policy?
Q2 2023
-
Nearshoring — North America’s Next Factory
Q2 2023
-
Front Line: Water Supply Increasingly Affecting Location Decisions
Q2 2023
-
Life Science Conversions in Real Estate
Q2 2023
-
First Person: Labor Crunch in the Construction Industry
Q2 2023
-
Companies Are Recalibrating Their Priorities
Q1 2023