23rd Annual Corporate Survey Analysis by Ed McCallum
Dec/Jan 09
![Figure 9.
When asked about how the downturn in the U.S. economy (up until late summer 2008) had affected their facility plans, just 24 percent of the respondents said their new facility plans had been put on hold, while 22 percent said they were still planning to open new facilities.](https://cdn9.areadevelopment.com/article_images/id94211_corporateanalysisbig.gif)
In spite of the recent volatility in the marketplace, there has not been a corresponding overreaction or concern regarding costs. Then again, perhaps there should be an overreaction.
In a cost-conscious environment, both energy availability and costs and labor costs would typically be of major issue; however, oddly enough, concern about these factors decreased by 1.1 and 0.9 percentage points, respectively. Is this sentiment sensible given that both energy and labor costs will certainly increase - that is if history teaches us anything? I would say that it is in some ways.
There is a greater concern over training programs and proximity to technical university, both of which increased by 5.7 percentage points. This speaks volumes about the where the focus should be in order to increase competitiveness in the marketplace. It begs the reader to ask the obvious question, "Is there enough concern?" Personally, I do not think there is regarding either energy costs or worker training.
Two dramatic statistics in the survey are the increased concern for the availability of healthcare facilities (which went up more than 20 percentage points) and the decreased concern for railroad service (which declined by almost 11 percentage points), although neither of these ratings should be surprising. One only has to examine the current demographic statistics on aging to understand why healthcare is an increasingly important component of work force recruitment and retention. I suspect this will be a continuing concern for a long time.
Regarding the decreased concern for railroad service, there has been a dramatic slowdown in very large capital investments, which typically are the exact industries that require rail. Of greater significance is the lack of concern over the economies associated with rail transport and the inevitable increase in energy costs on a transportation system that is way overtaxed. This is a mistake in a time when industry should be driving policymakers to correct this inadequacy.
Project Announcements
PEAK Precision Manufacturing Plans Bowling Green, Kentucky, Operations
07/26/2024
Italy-Based Sipcam Agro USA Upgrades Wayne County, Mississippi, Operations
07/26/2024
Cleveland-Cliffs Plans Weirton, West Virginia, Operations
07/26/2024
IDEXX Laboratories Plans Wilson, North Carolina, Production Operations
07/26/2024
Germany-Based Ritz Instrument Transformers Plans Waynesboro, Georgia, Operations
07/26/2024
AirJoule Plans Newark-Wilmington, Delaware, Operations
07/26/2024
Most Read
-
19th Annual Area Development Gold and Silver Shovel Awards
Q2 2024
-
2023's Leading Metro Locations: Hotspots of Economic Growth
Q4 2023
-
2023 Top States for Doing Business Meet the Needs of Site Selectors
Q3 2023
-
The CHIPS and Science Act will bring jobs back to the United States
Q2 2024
-
The Bring Your Own Energy (BYOE) Party Is Starting
Q2 2024
-
2023 Top States Commentary: Top-Ranked States Have What It Takes to Win Mega Projects
Q3 2023
-
How to Overcome NIMBYism in Data Centers
Q2 2024