Manufacturers Losing Intellectual Property to Security Breaches
Although manufacturers understand the importance of securing their intellectual property, few have adequate procedures in place to keep pace with today’s escalating risks.
Q3 2014
Manufacturers understand the importance of securing their intellectual property. According to the survey, they rank “internal operational information” and “intellectual property” as the two types of non-financial data they fear losing the most. Fear of losing “customer/client information” is ranked the lowest out of all business segments, probably because manufacturing facilities are less likely to store this information in the first place.
Nonetheless, few organizations have kept pace with today’s escalating risks, and fewer still are prepared to manage future threats. “You can’t fight today’s threats with yesterday’s strategies,” says Gary Loveland, a principal in PwC’s security practice. “What’s needed is a new model of information security, one that is driven by knowledge of threats, assets, and the motives and targets of potential adversaries.”
According to PwC’s Global State of Information Security® Survey 2014, executives are funding enhanced security activities, with budgets increasing from an average of $2.7 million in 2009 to $4.3 million last year. However, those seeking to undermine these efforts are one step ahead — security breaches increased 25 percent in the last year alone, says the PwC survey. And, unfortunately, even when in place, security technologies and policies often do not prevent incidents, according to the 2013 U.S. State of Cybercrime Survey, co-sponsored by PwC.
When it comes to intellectual property, the Cybercrime Survey notes that the percentage of respondents who have procedures dedicated to protecting IP has actually decreased — from 22 percent in 2011 to 20 percent in 2013. The percentage of those who conduct a regular review of users and access to IP also decreased from 37 percent in 2011 to 31 percent in 2013. Neither finding bodes well in today’s “elevated risk landscape.”
Project Announcements
Safire Technology Group Establishes Knoxville, Tennessee, Lithium-ion Battery Lab
01/30/2023
Miller Industries Expands Fenton Township, Michigan, Manufacturing Campus
01/30/2023
Zinc8 Energy Solutions Plans Ulster County, New York, Manufacturing Center-Headquarters
01/27/2023
Korea-Based SK Battery America Plans Roswell, Georgia, Regional IT Hub
01/27/2023
North American Stainless Plans Ghent, Kentucky, Manufacturing Complex
01/27/2023
LioChem e-Materials Establishes Simpson County, Kentucky, Manufacturing Plant
01/27/2023
Most Read
-
2022 Top States for Doing Business Provide an Environment for Business Growth
Q3 2022
-
Three Big Challenges Facing the Food & Beverage Industry
Q4 2022
-
Location Factors in the EV Industry — “Mission Critical” or “Nice to Have”?
2022 Auto/Aero Site Guide
-
36th Annual Corporate Survey: Executives Focus on Labor, Energy, Shipping Costs
Q1 2022
-
Innovation Corridors Update
Q4 2022
-
Fixing the Supply Chain with AI and Robotics
Q4 2022
-
Food Processors’ Optimal Location Decision
Q4 2022