Manufacturers Losing Intellectual Property to Security Breaches
Although manufacturers understand the importance of securing their intellectual property, few have adequate procedures in place to keep pace with today’s escalating risks.
Q3 2014
Manufacturers understand the importance of securing their intellectual property. According to the survey, they rank “internal operational information” and “intellectual property” as the two types of non-financial data they fear losing the most. Fear of losing “customer/client information” is ranked the lowest out of all business segments, probably because manufacturing facilities are less likely to store this information in the first place.
Nonetheless, few organizations have kept pace with today’s escalating risks, and fewer still are prepared to manage future threats. “You can’t fight today’s threats with yesterday’s strategies,” says Gary Loveland, a principal in PwC’s security practice. “What’s needed is a new model of information security, one that is driven by knowledge of threats, assets, and the motives and targets of potential adversaries.”
According to PwC’s Global State of Information Security® Survey 2014, executives are funding enhanced security activities, with budgets increasing from an average of $2.7 million in 2009 to $4.3 million last year. However, those seeking to undermine these efforts are one step ahead — security breaches increased 25 percent in the last year alone, says the PwC survey. And, unfortunately, even when in place, security technologies and policies often do not prevent incidents, according to the 2013 U.S. State of Cybercrime Survey, co-sponsored by PwC.
When it comes to intellectual property, the Cybercrime Survey notes that the percentage of respondents who have procedures dedicated to protecting IP has actually decreased — from 22 percent in 2011 to 20 percent in 2013. The percentage of those who conduct a regular review of users and access to IP also decreased from 37 percent in 2011 to 31 percent in 2013. Neither finding bodes well in today’s “elevated risk landscape.”
Project Announcements
Northland Corporation Expands Greenville, Michigan, Operations
08/29/2024
Swedish Match Expands Daviess County, Kentucky, Operations
08/29/2024
Ardent Mills Expands Commerce City, Colorado, Production Operations
08/29/2024
Paul Mueller Company Expands Springfield, Missouri, Manufacturing Operations
08/29/2024
Nashville Wire Products Expands McEwen, Tennessee, Operations
08/28/2024
Crusoe Energy Systems Plans Tulsa, Oklahoma, Manufacturing Operations
08/27/2024
Most Read
-
19th Annual Area Development Gold and Silver Shovel Awards
Q2 2024
-
What the Latest EPA PFAS Rule Means for Site Due Diligence
Q3 2024
-
Semiconductors’ fragile relationship with water may be tested
Q3 2024
-
2023 Top States Commentary: Top-Ranked States Have What It Takes to Win Mega Projects
Q3 2023
-
2023 Top States for Doing Business Meet the Needs of Site Selectors
Q3 2023
-
2023's Leading Metro Locations: Hotspots of Economic Growth
Q4 2023
-
Mitigating Site Risks for Industrial Projects
Q3 2024