Editor’s Note: To Incent or Not to Incent?
Research indicates that incentives “tip” only 20 percent of location decisions, but it seems that’s a percentage that states and communities aren’t willing to relinquish.
Q1 2019
In a recent report, Timothy Bartik, an economist with the Upjohn Institute for Employment Research in Kalamazoo, Michigan, looked at incentives nationally. He estimated that incentives “tip” only about 20 percent of all projects — the remaining 80 percent of projects would happen anyway, even without the incentives, he noted. Yet, because many locations use incentives to help lure businesses, all states and cities feel they must provide incentives in order to compete for a project’s promised jobs and tax revenue. Former Delaware Governor Jack Markell explained this dynamic in a New York Times op-ed piece. He noted that companies see the offer of incentives as evidence that a locality is committed to their company’s future.
Our recent annual Corporate Survey — the results of which are presented in this issue — confirms the importance of tax exemptions and other state and local incentives to businesses, with more than 80 percent of the respondents rating these factors as “very important” or “important.” But, as Markell said, “It would be better for taxpayers if these kinds of cash incentives could be invested instead in such things as schools and infrastructure.”
A recent article in Inc. tends to agree — especially when it comes to building up “innovation ecosystems.” Without investment in education and infrastructure, a location cannot support high-value industries no matter what incentives they offer, the article noted. Nonetheless, incentives will remain in the economic development toolbox and if properly targeted and evaluated — e.g., to firms that invest in R&D or skills training, said Bartik — they can hold value for a community as well as a company. So, the question remains, to incent or not to incent?
Recent Project Announcements
Hikma Pharmaceuticals Plans Columbus-Bedford, Ohio, Biomanufacturing Operations
06/16/2026
NPL Construction Plans Greenwood, Mississippi, Fabrication Operations
06/16/2026
C&C Forest Products Modernizes Coushatta, Louisiana, Sawmill Operations
06/16/2026
CQT Weapon Systems Expands Macomb Township, Michigan, Manufacturing Operations
06/16/2026
Scout Space Expands Fairfax County, Virginia, Production Operations
06/15/2026
CRP Automotive Plans Pittsfield, Michigan, Operations
06/15/2026
Faith Technologies Plans Monroe, Louisiana, Manufacturing Operations
06/15/2026
Front Line Safety Plans Kansas City, Missouri, Distribution Operations
06/14/2026
Durango Machining Innovations Plans Farmington, New Mexico, Operations
06/14/2026
West Fraser Expands McDavid, Florida, Sawmill Operations
06/14/2026
Alstom Plans Newark, Delaware, Operations
06/14/2026
Janicki Industries Plans Great Falls, Montana, Manufacturing Operations
06/13/2026
Urban Outfitters Plans Bucks County, Pennsylvania, Operations
06/13/2026
Raytheon Expands Portsmouth, Rhode Island, Missile Defense Operations
06/13/2026
Most Read
-
Where Early-Stage Life Sciences Companies Get Stuck Scaling Their Real Estate—and How to Move Forward
Q2 2026
-
Where Workforce Capacity Is Being Built — and Where It’s Being Deployed
Q1 2026
-
40th Annual Corporate and 22nd Annual Consultant Site Selection Survey Results
Q1 2026
-
2025’s Top States for Business: How the Winners Are Outpacing the Rest
Q3 2025
-
The Workforce Bottleneck in America’s Manufacturing Revival
Q4 2025
-
What Does “Site Readiness” Really Mean?
Q1 2026
-
Phillip Morris International Starting Building Before Plans
Q1 2026