Editor’s Note: To Incent or Not to Incent?
Research indicates that incentives “tip” only 20 percent of location decisions, but it seems that’s a percentage that states and communities aren’t willing to relinquish.
Q1 2019
In a recent report, Timothy Bartik, an economist with the Upjohn Institute for Employment Research in Kalamazoo, Michigan, looked at incentives nationally. He estimated that incentives “tip” only about 20 percent of all projects — the remaining 80 percent of projects would happen anyway, even without the incentives, he noted. Yet, because many locations use incentives to help lure businesses, all states and cities feel they must provide incentives in order to compete for a project’s promised jobs and tax revenue. Former Delaware Governor Jack Markell explained this dynamic in a New York Times op-ed piece. He noted that companies see the offer of incentives as evidence that a locality is committed to their company’s future.
Our recent annual Corporate Survey — the results of which are presented in this issue — confirms the importance of tax exemptions and other state and local incentives to businesses, with more than 80 percent of the respondents rating these factors as “very important” or “important.” But, as Markell said, “It would be better for taxpayers if these kinds of cash incentives could be invested instead in such things as schools and infrastructure.”
A recent article in Inc. tends to agree — especially when it comes to building up “innovation ecosystems.” Without investment in education and infrastructure, a location cannot support high-value industries no matter what incentives they offer, the article noted. Nonetheless, incentives will remain in the economic development toolbox and if properly targeted and evaluated — e.g., to firms that invest in R&D or skills training, said Bartik — they can hold value for a community as well as a company. So, the question remains, to incent or not to incent?
Recent Project Announcements
Pivot Bio Expands Hazelwood, Missouri, Operations
04/29/2026
Davis Timber Company Expands DeRidder, Louisiana, Manufacturing Operations
04/28/2026
Blevins Asphalt Expands Mount Vernon, Missouri, Maintenance Operations
04/28/2026
Niagara Bottling Plans Perth, New York, Production-Warehouse Operations
04/26/2026
Marubeni-Itochu Steel America Plans Osceola, Arkansas, Flat-Rolled Steel Operations
04/25/2026
Corderill Plans Meridian, Mississippi, Operations
04/25/2026
Ferrara Candy Plans Orangeburg County, South Carolina, Production Operations
04/25/2026
Blue Ops Plans Valdosta, Georgia, Manufacturing Operations
04/25/2026
Virginia Transformer Expands Rincon, Georgia, Production Operations
04/25/2026
AbbVie Plans Durham, North Carolina, Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Operations
04/24/2026
Air Liquide Plans St. James Parish, Louisiana, Production Operations
04/24/2026
Envoy Air Expands Little Rock, Arkansas, Operations
04/24/2026
Australia-Based Syenta Establishes Tempe, Arizona, Semiconductor Development Operations
04/23/2026
Mondi Expands Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, Production Operations
04/23/2026
Most Read
-
Economic Developer Role Shifting from Deal-Making to Systems Stewardship
Q1 2026
-
What Companies Need from Modern Manufacturing Sites
Q1 2026
-
Top States for Doing Business in 2024: A Continued Legacy of Excellence
Q3 2024
-
Capitalizing on the OBBBA Before the 2026 Cliff
Q1 2026
-
40th Annual Corporate and 22nd Annual Consultant Site Selection Survey Results
Q1 2026
-
Where Workforce Capacity Is Being Built — and Where It’s Being Deployed
Q1 2026
-
Last Word: Don’t Lose by Winning
Q1 2026