We also observe that companies are still highly influenced by the average wages and available workforce within an area. Understanding that wages are high and that the available workforce has been limited over the last couple of years, access to training programs is extremely important for growing a workforce internally for many businesses. Additionally, states that support companies with investment incentives for automation help them bridge the gap due to a limited available workforce and increasing production demands. Process automation will only continue in the future, and states that support these investments will continue to see significant economic development traction. Similarly, states should expect greater demand for support with sustainable or renewable projects as more and more businesses are looking to make direct investments in those areas.
The results of the Area Development’s Top States for Doing Business survey show that regions appear to have what we call a “node” state (a top performer), with surrounding states competing for business with similar programs and resources. For example, Georgia was listed as the number-one state in seven out of 14 categories and in the top five for five other categories. However, Tennessee and North and South Carolina were always within a few positions. Similarly, Ohio performed well in many categories, with Indiana, Virginia, and Kentucky close behind.
States that consider neighboring programs and seek to replicate or improve on them will continue to deliver value to businesses making critical location decisions. We believe there are a few states to keep an eye on, such as Iowa in the Great Plains region, Arizona in the West, and Louisiana in the South. These states have seen significant growth and were in the top 10 in several categories. They continue to innovate and evaluate their performance against their peers and (we believe) will continue to rise in the rankings.
TOP STATES FOR DOING BUSINESS 2023
- 1. Georgia
- 2. South Carolina
- 3. Tennessee
- 4. North Carolina
- 5. Ohio
- 6. Alabama
- 7. Indiana
- 8. Texas
- 9. Virginia
- 10. Mississippi
- 11. Louisiana
- 12. Arizona
- 13. Michigan
- 14. Kentucky
- 15. Florida
- 16. New York
- 17. Iowa
- 18. Arkansas
- 19. Kansas
- 20. Illinois
Individual Categories
Workforce Training Programs
- 1. Georgia
- 2. Virginia
- 3. South Carolina
- 4. Louisiana
- 5. Alabama
- 6. Tennessee
- 7. North Carolina
- 8. Indiana
- 9. Arizona
- 10. Ohio
Overall Cost of Doing Business
- 1. Georgia
- 2. Alabama
- 3. Tennessee
- 4. South Carolina
- 5. North Carolina
- 6. Indiana
- 7. Mississippi
- 8. Ohio
- 9. Texas
- 10. Louisiana
Business Incentives Programs
- 1. Georgia
- 2. South Carolina
- 3. Ohio
- 4. Indiana
- 5. Tennessee
- 6. North Carolina
- 7. Alabama
- 8. Virginia
- 9. Arkansas
- 10. Mississippi
Access to Capital & Funding
- 1. California
- 2. New York
- 3. Texas
- 4. Massachusetts
- 5. Georgia
- 6. Virginia
- 7. Illinois
- 8. North Carolina
- 9.Arizona
- 10. Maryland
Competitive Labor Environment
- 1. Georgia
- 2. North Carolina
- 3. Ohio
- 4. South Carolina
- 5. Indiana
- 6. Texas
- 7. Virginia
- 8. Tennessee
- 9. Arizona
- 10. Alabama
Energy Availability & Costs
- 1. Georgia
- 2. Tennessee
- 3. South Carolina
- 4. Alabama
- 5. North Carolina
- 6. Texas
- 7. Washington
- 8. Oregon
- 9. Indiana
- 10. Iowa
Water Availability
- 1. Ohio
- 2. Michigan
- 3. Tennessee
- 4. South Carolina
- 5. North Carolina
- 6. Georgia
- 7. New York
- 8. Wisconsin
- 9. Washington
- 10. Virginia
Logistics & Infrastructure
- 1. Georgia
- 2. Texas
- 3. Indiana
- 4. Ohio
- 5. South Carolina
- 6. Virginia
- 7. Tennessee
- 8. Kentucky
- 9. North Carolina
- 10. Illinois
Available Real Estate
- 1. South Carolina
- 2. Texas
- 3. Ohio
- 4. Georgia
- 5. North Carolina
- 6. Indiana
- 7. Tennessee
- 8. Virginia
- 9. Alabama
- 10. Arizona
Cooperative & Responsive State Government
- 1. Georgia
- 2. Tennessee
- 3. North Carolina
- 4. South Carolina
- 5. Ohio
- 6. Indiana
- 7. Virginia
- 8. Alabama
- 9. Arizona
- 10. Michigan
Corporate Tax Structure
- 1. Florida
- 2. North Carolina
- 3. Texas
- 4. Tennessee
- 5. Indiana
- 6. Georgia
- 7. Nevada
- 8. South Dakota
- 9. Ohio
- 10. Arizona
Site-Readiness Programs
- 1. South Carolina
- 2. Georgia
- 3. Ohio
- 4. Tennessee
- 5. Indiana
- 6. North Carolina
- 7. Virginia
- 8. Alabama
- 9. Kentucky
- 10. Iowa
Favorable Regulatory Environment
- 1. Alabama
- 2. South Carolina
- 3. Georgia
- 4. Tennessee
- 5. North Carolina
- 6. Indiana
- 7. Ohio
- 8. Texas
- 9. Louisiana
- 10. Mississippi
Speed of Project Permitting
- 1. South Carolina
- 2. Alabama
- 3. Georgia
- 4. Mississippi
- 5. Tennessee
- 6. Indiana
- 7. Virginia
- 8. Ohio
- 9. Iowa
- 10. North Carolina
-
Categories:
- Workforce Training Programs
- Overall Cost of Doing Business
- Business Incentive Programs
- Access to Capital & Funding
- Competitive Labor Market
- Energy Availability & Costs
- Water Availability
- Logistics & Infrastructure
- Available Real Estate
- Cooperative & Responsive State Government
- Corporate Tax Structure
- Site-Readiness Programs
- Favorable Regulatory Environment
- Speed of Project Permitting