23rd Annual Corporate Survey Analysis by Les J. Cranmer and Art M. Wegfahrt
Dec/Jan 09

Looking at the rankings over time (2003-2008), the top-10 factors have not varied greatly, in terms of both inclusion and weighting. There have only been a few exceptions to the top 10, with eight of the factors always included: highway accessibility, labor costs, availability of skilled labor, state and local incentives, corporate tax rate, tax exemptions, occupancy and construction costs, and energy availability and costs. Available land and proximity to market were mentioned three times. Environmental regulations was included twice, as was availability of telecom services. This factor was changed to availability of high-speed Internet access, and that was included three times as well. Low-union profile was mentioned once.
On a specific level, although the survey responses were submitted before the financial markets meltdown, they were completed during a time when the equity and credit markets were showing strong signs of economic adjustment. With this in mind, we were curious to see if this year's corporate responses would be telltale, in terms of corporate attitude toward business growth and priorities. Of particular note, we looked for indications of changes in the respondents' views on projected business expansion and contraction, capital investment planning, and short-term vs. long-term planning emphasis.
Comparative responses between 2007 and 2008 indicate an upswing in projected new job and facility creation. And although additional offshore locations are planned, 96 percent of those responding stated that they would not be increasing or decreasing moves in either direction - on- or offshore.
Additionally, 68 percent of the respondents indicated that the tightening of the credit markets is not affecting their facility plans. This is further supported by the reasons for decreasing the number of facilities; 100 percent of those doing so said it was for consolidation, and 56 percent pointed to a need to lower costs, but only 39 percent indicated a decrease in product sales. These findings clearly indicate the current business turmoil has not found its way into this survey response - next year's survey should be extremely interesting.
Project Announcements
Albemarle Corporation Plans Chester County, South Carolina, Lithium Hydroxide Processing Plant
03/23/2023
Tillamook County Creamery Association Plans Decatur, Illinois, Ice Cream Manufacturing Plant
03/23/2023
ENTEK Plans Terre Haute, Indiana, ‘Wet-Process’ Lithium-ion Battery Plant
03/23/2023
Dr. Marty Pets Establishes Richfield, Wisconsin, Manufacturing Operations
03/23/2023
Schrödinger Expands New York, New York, Research Operations
03/23/2023
Swiss-Based Glencore-ZEB Plan Moncks Corner, South Carolina, Aluminum Recycling Plant
03/23/2023
Most Read
-
37th Annual Corporate Survey: Economic Pressures Exerting Greatest Effect on Decision-Makers
Q1 2023
-
19th Annual Consultants Survey: Clients Challenged by Tight Labor Market, Energy Availability
Q1 2023
-
The Top Investment Location Prospects for Aerospace Manufacturing
Q1 2023
-
2022 Top States for Doing Business Provide an Environment for Business Growth
Q3 2022
-
36th Annual Corporate Survey: Executives Focus on Labor, Energy, Shipping Costs
Q1 2022
-
Strategies to Overcome Intensifying Industrial Real Estate Challenges
Q1 2023
-
How Are Economic Developers Partnering to Solve Workforce Challenges?
Q1 2023