Consultants Forum Advertise
Subscribe
Close

  • Free for qualified executives and consultants to industry

  • Receive quarterly issues of Area Development Magazine and special market report and directory issues

Subscribe Now
Renew

Area Development - Site Selection, Facility Planning and Workforce Development

2021 Top States Commentary: Location Strategies Altered by the Pandemic, But Not Results

Although both the location advisors and economic developers have had limited project experiences during this past year, the 2021 results align with what we have seen in past years.

Q3 2021
2020 was indeed an unusual year — as one of our clients asked rhetorically, “So, when’s the last time the world stopped?”

Capital projects were placed on hold (with only a few exceptions). Uncertainty in buyer demand, government regulations, and financial performance caused a major time-out in both the public and private sectors. Most location-focused projects were suspended, if not outright cancelled. Therefore, it must be recognized that any advisor’s opinions collected with this survey are most likely limited based on severely curtailed project activity — but will the results be different than in past years?

All the advisors responding to this survey have based their opinions on their individual recent experiences garnered while assisting clients with the few projects of various types and sizes that went forward. In dealing with the various states, one must keep in mind that those experiences varied greatly in terms of site-readiness, labor availability, operating costs, etc.

However, if one were to view this year’s results by comparing them to those of 2016–2020, interestingly, many of the same states have appeared in the top 10 rankings over the past five years (specifically GA, SC, TX, TN, AL, IN, NC). Therefore, we find this year’s results very credible despite the unusual circumstances. Prior to 2020, at the highest level of perspective, business was extremely robust, and corporations were enjoying a time period that saw strong consumer confidence, low economic volatility, and little hesitation making long-term business commitments. While we all know there are exceptions to anything, the pandemic will certainly bring about major change.

Several factors come to mind: overall corporate location strategies may be modified; search criteria may be re-emphasized to include how well states and local governments handled COVID mandates; and how the process is conducted may be altered (e.g., minimal community tours, etc.). In short, corporations were (maybe still are) not comfortable making long-term decisions, and costs associated with location analysis are thought to be better spent elsewhere.

Additionally, based on delayed business growth during this past year, many advisors and client organizations have found themselves performing incentive restructuring/recasting with state and local governments. New job creation and capital spending time commitments contained within initial incentive agreements have been delayed in most cases — and although these investments will eventually occur, time schedule relief is necessary until business resumes in a normal fashion. Therefore, the category of “cooperative and responsive state government” will become increasingly important in the next few years, perhaps in a way not seen in the past.

TOP STATES FOR DOING BUSINESS 2021

  1. 1. Georgia
  2. 2. Texas
  3. 3. Tennessee
  4. 4. South Carolina
  5. 5. North Carolina
  6. 6. Alabama
  7. 7. Indiana
  8. 8. Virginia
  9. 9. Ohio
  10. 10. Florida
  11. 11. Arizona
  12. 12. Mississippi
  13. 13. Louisiana
  14. 14. California
  15. 15. Nevada
  16. 16. Kentucky
  17. 17. Utah
  18. 18. Oklahoma
  19. 19. New York
  20. 20. Kansas

Individual Categories

Overall Cost of Doing Business

  1. 1. Georgia
  2. 2T. North Carolina
  3. 2T. Alabama
  4. 4T. Texas
  5. 4T. Tennessee
  6. 4T. South Carolina
  7. 7. Mississippi
  8. 8. Indiana
  9. 9T. Florida
  10. 9T. Arizona

Business Incentives Programs

  1. 1. South Carolina
  2. 2. Georgia
  3. 3. Alabama
  4. 4. Tennessee
  5. 5T. Indiana
  6. 5T. Mississippi
  7. 7T. North Carolina
  8. 7T. Virginia
  9. 7T. Louisiana
  10. 10. Texas

Access to Capital & Project Funding

  1. 1. California
  2. 2. Texas
  3. 3. New York
  4. 4. Massachusetts
  5. 5. Georgia
  6. 6. North Carolina
  7. 7. Illinois
  8. 8. Florida
  9. 9T. Tennessee
  10. 9T. Arizona

Competitive Labor Environment

  1. 1T. Georgia
  2. 1T. Texas
  3. 3. North Carolina
  4. 4. Florida
  5. 5T. Tennessee
  6. 5T. Virginia
  7. 5T. Arizona
  8. 8. Indiana
  9. 9T. South Carolina
  10. 9T. Alabama

Workforce Development Programs

  1. 1. Georgia
  2. 2T. Virginia
  3. 2T. Louisiana
  4. 4. South Carolina
  5. 5. Alabama
  6. 6T. North Carolina
  7. 6T. Tennessee
  8. 8T. Arizona
  9. 8T. Ohio
  10. 10T. Texas
  11. 10T. Florida
  12. 10T. California

Energy Availability & Costs

  1. 1. Tennessee
  2. 2. Georgia
  3. 3. Texas
  4. 4. North Carolina
  5. 5.
  6. 6T. South Carolina
  7. 6T. Kentucky
  8. 8T. Arizona
  9. 8T. Alabama
  10. 10. Oklahoma

Logistics & Infrastructure

  1. 1. Texas
  2. 2. Georgia
  3. 3T. Tennessee
  4. 3T. Indiana
  5. 5T. Virginia
  6. 5T. South Carolina
  7. 7. Ohio
  8. 8. California
  9. 9. North Carolina
  10. 10T. Kentucky
  11. 10T. Illinois

Site-Readiness Programs

  1. 1. Tennessee
  2. 2. Georgia
  3. 3. North Carolina
  4. 4T. South Carolina
  5. 4T. Ohio
  6. 6T. Virginia
  7. 6T. Indiana
  8. 8. Alabama
  9. 9T. Texas
  10. 9T. Arizona
  11. 9T. Kentucky

Available Real Estate

  1. 1T. Texas
  2. 1T. Georgia
  3. 3. North Carolina
  4. 4T. Ohio
  5. 4T. South Carolina
  6. 6. Tennessee
  7. 7T. Arizona
  8. 7T. Alabama
  9. 9. Indiana
  10. 10. Florida

Cooperative & Responsive State Government

  1. 1. Georgia
  2. 2. Tennessee
  3. 3. Indiana
  4. 4. South Carolina
  5. 5. North Carolina
  6. 6T. Alabama
  7. 6T. Virginia
  8. 8. Mississippi
  9. 9. Arizona
  10. 10T. Texas
  11. 10T. Ohio

Corporate Tax Environment

  1. 1. Texas
  2. 2. Florida
  3. 3T. Nevada
  4. 3T. North Carolina
  5. 5. Tennessee
  6. 6. Ohio
  7. 7T. Indiana
  8. 7T. South Dakota
  9. 9. Georgia
  10. 10T. Utah
  11. 10T. Wyoming

Favorable Regulatory Environment

  1. 1. South Carolina
  2. 2. Texas
  3. 3T. Georgia
  4. 3T. Alabama
  5. 5. Indiana
  6. 6. Tennessee
  7. 7. Mississippi
  8. 8T. Arizona
  9. 8T. Nevada
  10. 10T. North Carolina
  11. 10T. Florida
  12. 10T. Utah

Speed of Permitting

  1. 1. Alabama
  2. 2. South Carolina
  3. 3. Georgia
  4. 4. Mississippi
  5. 5. Texas
  6. 6. Tennessee
  7. 7. Virginia
  8. 8. North Carolina
  9. 9T. Arizona
  10. 9T. Louisiana
  11. 9T. Indiana

Exclusive Research