U.S. Companies Reshoring Operations Back Home
American business executives are reconsidering their overseas operations and realizing that outsourcing may not be the best option.
2011 Directory
Several factors are driving this sea change, from rising shipping and transportation costs to quality control issues to a desire among U.S. companies with overseas operations to do their part in rebuilding the hurting economy at home.
When given the choice, most U.S.-based companies that outsource overseas would choose to move operations back home if it made financial sense to do so. Once business leaders learn that there are U.S. locations with qualified and affordable labor, low taxes, and attractive economic incentives, they are often eager to explore their options to relocate back to the United States.
At Ecodev, we are seeing a number of small- to mid-sized manufacturers rethinking their overseas operations and questioning the financial incentives that lured them there in the first place. One Minnesota manufacturer that produces its products in China recently decided to move a production facility back to the United States. It expects an approximately 25 percent savings on the overall cost of each item due to cost savings of shipping and transportation. And California-based Seesmart LED, which makes light-emitting-diode (LED) light bulbs in China, is scouting U.S. production locations. Its executives say that when they consider all costs, the difference to produce its product in the United States is insignificant, and they would prefer to create jobs here.
For small- to mid-sized businesses with overseas operations, the time is right to examine overall operating expenses and determine if these facilities are financially viable, or if a return to the United States better suits long-term growth. Reconsidering Outsourcing
Here are three top reasons U.S. companies are rethinking their overseas operations:
Unrealized Cost Savings - Cheap labor remains a top factor companies outsource overseas. While the United States cannot compete with the low working wages for unskilled labor in some countries, a growing number of American workers with a wide variety of education and job skills are ready to work. Companies that require an educated or skilled work force may be better served by American labor.
Furthermore, cheap labor alone should not drive a company's decision to locate overseas, as more companies realize that overall operating costs of doing business in foreign countries are not lower. For instance, rising shipping and transportation costs can make outsourcing cost-prohibitive, particularly if a company has a high volume, lower priced item. Others may find unanticipated expenditures, such as added security in certain parts of Mexico that are experiencing drug trafficking violence. When companies consider all of their operating costs, they may find that they are not actually saving money.
Quality/Reliability Issues - Companies with production overseas can be vulnerable to quality control issues, as foreign countries do not have the same standards as the United States. In terms of reliability, these companies struggle with producing and shipping products on time. China experiences rolling power blackouts that hinder production and delivery timelines. Increased quality control and the management of unreliable fulfillment dates negatively affect the company's bottom line.
Consumer Perception - Companies that uproot U.S. operations and move jobs to other countries have never been met with favor on the home front. Companies that do so in today's depressed economy may tarnish their own reputation. When Polaris Industries, an ATV, snowmobile, and motorcycle manufacturer, recently decided to move its Osceola, Wisconsin, plant to Mexico, many customers told the company they would never buy a Polaris product again.
As consumers grow more conscious of where products are made and use their buying power to support American-made goods, more businesses recognize the value of a "Made in the U.S.A." label. Others, like Seesmart LED, attempt to help the U.S. economy and recognize that the benefits of operating stateside offset the meager cost savings of operating overseas.
Outsourcing is not what it used to be. Whether it's an altruistic motive, or realizing the unforeseen costs and downsides of outsourcing, companies with overseas operations should consider how a move back to United States may improve profitability and reputation in the long run.
Recent Project Announcements
Buffalo Rock Company Plans Loxley, Alabama, Distribution Operations
05/07/2026
South Korea-Based ELSPES Plans Osceola County, Florida, Headquarters-Manufacturing Operations
05/06/2026
American Sugar Refining Expands St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana, Operations
05/06/2026
Southern Classic Food Group Expands Brundidge, Alabama, Production Operations
05/05/2026
France-Based ARMOR-IIMAK Expands Boone County, Kentucky, Operations
05/05/2026
Global Business Solutions Expands Covington, Kentucky, Operations
05/05/2026
LEV Manufacturing Plans Putnam County, Tennessee, Assembly-Logistics Operations
05/05/2026
IonQ Expands Bothell, Washington, Operations
05/05/2026
Avant Technology Expands Pharr, Texas, Manufacturing Operations
05/05/2026
Czech Republic-Based GHH-BONATRANS Plans Wayland, New York, Production Operations
05/05/2026
Toothsure Plans Perry County, Kentucky, Operations
05/04/2026
Applied Optoelectronics Expands Sugar Land, Texas, Production Operations
05/04/2026
IBM Plans Chicago, Illinois, AI Data Center Operations
05/02/2026
Turner Industries Plans New Iberia-Port Allen, Louisiana, Nuclear Fabrication Operations
05/02/2026
Most Read
-
Economic Developer Role Shifting from Deal-Making to Systems Stewardship
Q1 2026
-
Top States for Doing Business in 2024: A Continued Legacy of Excellence
Q3 2024
-
Where Workforce Capacity Is Being Built — and Where It’s Being Deployed
Q1 2026
-
40th Annual Corporate and 22nd Annual Consultant Site Selection Survey Results
Q1 2026
-
Last Word: Don’t Lose by Winning
Q1 2026
-
2025’s Top States for Business: How the Winners Are Outpacing the Rest
Q3 2025
-
The Workforce Bottleneck in America’s Manufacturing Revival
Q4 2025