The H-1B Visa Debate
Some say Congress should raise current limits on foreign workers in the United States; others disagree. But proposed changes to the law may satisfy both sides.
But deciding who gets these visas has become a contentious issue. Current law limits the number of H-1B visas to 65,000 per year, with an additional 20,000 exemptions for advanced degree holders. For fiscal year 2007 - which began on October 1, 2006 and runs through September 30, 2007 - the 65,000 visas were gone by May 2006, the earliest the cap has ever been reached. This has made additional hiring of immigrants by U.S. firms impossible until the next fiscal year; employers wanting H-1B visas for 2008 may not begin applying until April 1, 2007.
"We've reached a situation where we're running out of visas months before the fiscal year begins," says Lynn Shotwell, executive director for the American Council on International Personnel and spokesperson for Compete America. "The situation has become much more desperate than it has been in years past." Compete America, a coalition of more than 200 corporations, universities, research institutions and trade associations, has been a strong supporter for raising the H-1B cap limit.
Raising the Cap
For many manufacturers, as well as other tech and non-tech companies, securing enough H-1B visas has become an arduous and time-consuming endeavor. The process requires significant paperwork and application fees for what may turn out to be wasted effort. Shotwell and the organizations she represents believe the United States needs a more streamlined immigration policy, particularly where the H-1B visa is concerned. "Companies need to have access to the talent they need when they need it," she says. "They need to hire the best person for the job when the position arises, not 18 months in advance because there's an arbitrary quota on visas available."
To get around the problem, some manufacturers find it is easier to set up shop overseas, with a labor force at the ready, rather than trying to cut through visa red tape. Boeing, for example, has manufacturing plants across the world, and the company's need for technically skilled workers is great. "All of our design work is on computers," says Bob Jorgensen, spokesperson for Boeing. "It's a maze of computers throughout our factories." While Boeing does operate manufacturing plants in the United States, Jorgensen says the company is able to sidestep many visa challenges by locating plants in other countries. He cites a major design center in Russia as just one example.
Foreign students trying to attend U.S. universities also find themselves trapped in H-1B limbo. These students find they must first scale immigration barriers to get into U.S. universities, and then they must confront barriers in securing H-1B visa to work in the United States after graduation. "We've invested from four to 10 years into educating these people, and we want to have the benefit of that training and talent, rather than having them leave [to go back] overseas," says Malpert.
Typically, foreign students graduating from U.S. universities are granted a one-year student work visa. In the past, that has provided enough time for them to apply for and receive their permanent H-1B visa. But now that H-1B visa caps are being filled quickly, students can no longer count on receiving the H-1B before their student visas expire. Shotwell argues that if this situation is allowed to continue, U.S. universities will be less attractive to foreign nationals. "Since 9/11, we've seen a decline in foreign student enrollment because of problems getting student visas, and we've seen other countries take advantage of that," she says.
In essence, those who advocate for raising the H-1B visa cap maintain that there is a shortage of qualified American workers to fill technical jobs - positions that foreign workers can readily fill. "We're all competing around the globe for a limited talent pool," says Shotwell, "and we know that enough people haven't been born to fill all these jobs."
Keeping the Cap
But not everyone agrees with that sentiment. Critics of the H-1B argue that plenty of qualified workers are available in the United States, and hiring foreign workers will only take jobs away from Americans. "Right now, the cap is the only thing that's protecting U.S. workers," says Rob Hira, vice president for IEEE-USA, an organization that promotes the careers and public policy interests of engineers, scientists, and allied professionals. "If we got rid of the cap, I think it would be a disaster for the U.S. labor market, especially in science and engineering."
Proponents of the H-1B visa contend that U.S. companies must first look for an American worker before hiring a foreign worker, so American workers are protected, but Hira says that's untrue. "You can hire an H-1B without ever looking for a U.S. worker," he says. "There's no regulation for that." Those who are against raising the cap also point to the number of workers, particularly in manufacturing, who have lost their jobs. "How can there be labor shortages in manufacturing when we keep shutting down plants and laying off people?" asks Richard Tax, president of the American Engineering Association. "They say we can't get programmers, but programmers are being laid off. And in many cases, these people have to train their own replacements."
Companies that maintain they can't find qualified American workers with the right skills say they are forced to look overseas, but Tax takes exception to that. "Some of these companies are looking for a five-pound butterfly," he says. "If they can't find a five-pound butterfly, they say there is a shortage of butterflies. They make their specifications so specific as to exclude almost anyone here who could do the job."
35th Annual Corporate Survey: Effects of Global Pandemic Reflected in Executives’ Site and Facility Plans
What’s Driving Record Industrial Real Estate Demand
Mitigate the Risks of Supply Chain Disruption
Life Sciences Fueling Construction Demand
Challenges of Moving Manufacturing Out of China
35th Annual Survey of Corporate Executives Commentary: Change in Site Selection Priorities and Plans Over the Short and Long Term