• Free for qualified executives and consultants to industry

  • Receive quarterly issues of Area Development Magazine and special market report and directory issues


Worker Training: How Important Is It?

Access to training programs - and proximity to a technical university - are really more important than reflected by the low ranking given these factors by the respondents to Area Development's 2007 Corporate Survey.

Oct/Nov 08
(page 2 of 2)
How Close Is Close Enough?
For companies trying to evaluate the need for proximity to any given educational system, a considerable amount of due diligence should be undertaken to fully understand the quality of the training programs being offered by the respective state and community. To be blunt, some programs look good on paper; however, upon further examination, the ability to execute and deliver is lacking. As a result, close proximity will be very important in these locations. In other states and communities, however, the ability to quickly perform a needs assessment and develop and deliver training programs is superb; in those cases, proximity is not such an important factor.

The fact is that both capability and quality varies significantly within and between states. Some are outstanding and others are simply poor. Because of this, companies are spending more time understanding where and how skills will be developed and sustained over time. In response to this, many communities that may not have a technical university main campus are developing university extensions tied in with science parks, with a focus on integrating industry and learning at the local level.

Corporate Survey 2007
Combined Ratings* of 2007 Factors
Site Selection Factors           2006 2007
1. Highway accessibility 90.9 96.9
2. Labor costs 95.0 92.3
3. Energy availability and costs 82.4 89.0
4. Availability of skilled labor 85.1 88.7
5. Occupancy or construction costs 85.5 88.2
6. Available land 73.3 85.4
7. Corporate tax rate 90.8 83.8
8. State and local incentives 88.6 83.4
9. Environmental regulations 68.9 83.2
10. Tax Exemptions 86.7 82.8
10T. Proximity to Markets 76.9 82.8
Availability of advanced ICT services
N/A 82.2
12. Low union profile 78.4 80.6
13. Availability of buildings N/A 79.3
14. Right-to-work state 67.1 72.1
15. Proximity to suppliers 49.3 71.8
16. Expedited or "fast-track" permitting N/A 71.5
17. Availability of unskilled labor 65.3 65.2
18. Availability of long-term financing 64.1 63.0
19. Raw materials availability 64.1 62.5
20. Training programs 56.0 56.6
21. Accessibility to major airport 61.4 54.4
22. Railroad service 20.8 38.1
23. Proximity to technical university 30.0 32.7
24. Waterway or oceanport accessibility 17.0 15.2
*All figures are percentages and are the total of "very important" and "important" ratings of the Area Development Corporate Survey and are rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent.
Savannah, Ga., and Greenville, S.C., are two such examples, with the Georgia Tech Savannah Extension Campus and CU ICAR (Clemson University International Center for Automotive Research), respectively. The obvious take-away from this is that the states and communities that want to succeed in both retention and recruitment have to act. They have a moral imperative not only to industry, but also to their citizens, to improve worker skills.

Finally, I would be remiss if I did not point out that the cost of energy has played in important role in shaping clients' perspectives about what constitutes being "close." With gas prices hovering around $4 a gallon in some parts of the country, closer is better, particularly where a high level of interaction and collaboration is required. How long this perception will last is unknown; however, it is a factor that should not be casually dismissed.

In sum, the shortage of skilled workers in the United States is a pressing problem for manufacturers, and a renewed interest in developing the infrastructure and programs to respond to industry needs through training is crucial. Those locations that understand and act will be the better for it.

Follow Area Development