Economic Development in an Era of Political Uncertainty
The election results point to continued fiscal and tax uncertainty and no clear direction for economic development policy on federal, state, and local government levels.
November 2012

Just listening to the campaign rhetoric of the past year would make the average citizen believe that job creation and economic development were the top priorities of every candidate — from the President down to local town council members. Nearly every candidate ran on a platform promising to do more to stoke job creation, with a particular emphasis on promoting the growth of small businesses. Unfortunately, most of these claims were lacking in detail as to what the candidate would do to help create a strong business environment and instead relied more upon fiscal prescriptions, mostly tax cuts and reduced regulation, to spur economic recovery. At a time when our country, as well as many states and local governments, faces dire fiscal pressures, few concrete ideas were advanced that could be interpreted as the basis for a strong economic development strategic plan.
Mixed Results
Further, where there were specific measures on the ballot related to economic development, the record of success is very mixed. Beginning in July with the votes in 9 of 12 Georgia regions against a sales tax increase to support transportation investments, many economic development referenda suffered strong defeats. Two notable examples were (1) the defeat of the Vision2 bond package in Tulsa, Oklahoma, which would have provided money for airport improvements to reposition the area in the wake of anticipated layoffs at American Airlines’ maintenance hub and to create a regional economic development deal closing fund, and (2) the decision by South Dakota voters to roll back the creation of the Large Project Development Fund despite it having been adopted by large margins by the legislature just a year earlier.
Both efforts were sold as necessary to “incentivize” corporations to make job creation and investment decisions in those communities; they were defeated by a combination of bond and tax skeptics, those who believe incentives are a form of corporate welfare, and those who were concerned that limited public resources would be diverted away from education and healthcare to benefit private business. While each of these states continues to maintain a robust economic development effort, it was these new efforts which brought about voter wrath. In fact, Virginia saw the overwhelming passage of a constitutional amendment to severely restrict the taking of private property for economic development projects, another reaction to the U.S. Supreme Court’s Kelo decision, which has reshaped economic redevelopment projects across the country.
On the other hand, many local referenda in Florida to enact or extend existing ad valorem tax exemption programs for economic development passed handily. Maine’s Question 4, allowing the state to borrow over $51 million for economic development and transportation efforts, also passed easily.
Next: Lessons to be Learned
Project Announcements
Catalent Expands Clark County, Kentucky, Operations
05/20/2022
Flogistix Establishes El Reno, Oklahoma, Operations
05/19/2022
Do Good Foods Establishes Fort Wayne, Indiana, Operations Complex
05/19/2022
Five Star Food Service Relocates-Plans Chattanooga, Tennessee, Headquarters
05/19/2022
LaserForm & Machine Expands Columbia, South Carolina, Operations
05/19/2022
Opendoor Establishes Tempe, Arizona, Operations
05/19/2022
Most Read
-
The Evolution of the Megasite
Q2 2022
-
36th Annual Corporate Survey: Executives Focus on Labor, Energy, Shipping Costs
Q1 2022
-
Rail Gains Advantage Amidst Supply Chain Snarls
Q2 2022
-
The 2021 Top States for Doing Business Reflect Their Locational Advantages
Q3 2021
-
18th Annual Consultants Survey: Access to Major Markets and Skilled Labor Are Clients’ Primary Concerns
Q1 2022
-
2021 Gold & Silver Shovel Awards Recognize State and Local Economic Development Efforts
Q2 2021
-
Innovative and Collaborative Design Sets the Stage for Life Science Innovation
Q2 2022