A Survey of Corporate Energy Efficiency Strategies
10-5-2009
• 60% of respondents had full-time energy managers
• 87% built energy performance into the compensation review systems for facility/plant management
• 38% reported energy performance criteria at the senior management level.
Almost all respondents used specific financial criteria for energy efficiency investments, simple payback and internal rate of return (IRR) being the most common. Simple payback criteria were mostly three years or less, though two were as high as 5 years. IRR criteria were mostly in the 10-15% range, though one reported a 35% IRR threshold. Respondents also reported a variety of qualitative factors affecting their internal operations, supply chains, and product and services, and summarized the lessons learned and ongoing needs for their energy efficiency strategies.
Project Announcements
Lumber Liquidators Plans Lawrenceburg, Tennessee, Headquarters Operations
04/16/2026
Canada-Based Bioriginal Food & Science Plans Grand Junction, Colorado, Operations
04/15/2026
Sesajal Plans Temple, Texas, Warehousing-Production Operations
04/15/2026
Hitachi Energy Plans Cary, North Carolina, Operations
04/15/2026
Mercedes-Benz Expands Tuscaloosa County, Alabama, Production Operations
04/14/2026
Qblox Plans Canton, Massachusetts, Operations
04/14/2026
Most Read
-
Economic Developer Role Shifting from Deal-Making to Systems Stewardship
Q1 2026
-
What Companies Need from Modern Manufacturing Sites
Q1 2026
-
Top States for Doing Business in 2024: A Continued Legacy of Excellence
Q3 2024
-
Capitalizing on the OBBBA Before the 2026 Cliff
Q1 2026
-
Last Word: Don’t Lose by Winning
Q1 2026
-
Advanced Manufacturing Isn’t a Buzzword—It’s a Different Location Strategy
Q1 2026
-
40th Annual Corporate and 22nd Annual Consultant Site Selection Survey Results
Q1 2026