Government agencies are turning more frequently to financial incentives as tools for retaining businesses and jobs. But do these breaks benefit the communities, too?
Welcome to the ongoing world of incentives packages for business. More and more municipal governments, in order to convince companies to keep their jobs and tax revenues in their present locations, are using these packages. "There is a perception of companies, particularly in certain regions, that they are competing in a global economy, and the cost of operations is really critical," says Larry Kosmont, president of Kosmont Companies, a firm specializing in economic development and transactions between the public and private sector. "So in order to receive private investment, [these companies] feel they need to turn up the heat on being competitive, which means using targeted incentive programs."
According to Kosmont, incentives packages are efforts directly related to the economy, especially when communities are looking at quality job generation. What's more, he says, offering companies incentives to stay put is a practice that is here to stay.
"It's a function of communities trying to be competitive, and it's a function of the difficulty of generating a tax base," he says. "Cities and counties are after achieving a certain quality of life, and the pressure from their constituents to produce a good quality of life never ends. The more money you make the more money you spend, and I think that applies to communities as well. So they are always going to be on a strategic outlook for businesses, particularly ones that generate a good amount of quality jobs and general investment into the community."
Granting Growth Money
Sometimes communities can go to great lengths to keep their current businesses happy and in place. Stickley, a manufacturer of collector-quality fine furniture, had considered moving out of the Syracuse, New York, area, but thanks to a $500,000 capital grant from the state of New York's Empire State Development, the company decided to stay. Empire State Development was also instrumental in convincing Tessy Plastics, a manufacturer of plastics located in Elbridge, New York, to build a 60,000 square-foot facility in Elbridge, instead of Lynchburg, Virginia. The $6 million project retained 393 jobs in Elbridge and created an additional 100.
Last year, Cadbury Adams, the candy manufacturer, was given tax incentives under New Jersey's Business Retention and Relocation Assistance Grant (BRRAG) program. Cadbury Adams relocated 275 employees to its new U.S. and Americas headquarters in Parsippany, New Jersey, with the $412,500 grant. Cadbury plans to invest $8.3 million in future dollars into the community.
But not everyone is convinced of the benefit of these incentive programs, particularly for municipalities. "The problems that we see are companies being offered benefits that are above and beyond anything necessary to bring them into the community," says Carmen Balber, consumer advocate for Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights. "A corporation that is moving into a city is going to squeeze whatever they can out of that city, and those incentives can far outstrip the benefits that taxpayers receive in return." Balber points to a developer a few years ago who received multiple years' worth of tax breaks in order to redevelop part of the downtown Los Angeles area. "I think [incentives] come and go, as politicians are told by the businesses that are moving in that it's necessary or not."
Community and Infrastructure Support
According to Kosmont, the decision for a company or manufacturer to remain in its present location is based on a few factors, the first being the availability of investment infrastructure. "Location decisions for companies start with proximity to vendors, suppliers, or customers," he says. "If you have several locations that qualify, many times the tiebreaker comes down to the quality and level of investment in infrastructure."
Another big item, one that Kosmont says cities tend to discount, is the general support for business. Companies carefully weigh the overall climate and community support for business. "If you have a company that's going to make a long-term, large investment, they want to know they are dealing with a region that is supportive of business," he says. "And they look for those signs."
Kentucky is one such state that is offering incentives to keep existing businesses in place and efficiently operating. This past June, the Office of the Governor and the Kentucky Cabinet for Economic Development announced approval of tax incentives for Ford Motor Company under the Kentucky Jobs Retention Act (KJRA). Ford has agreed to invest in its Louisville, Kentucky, truck plant to increase efficiency and reliability at the facility. The $66 million project, approved by the Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority (KEDFA), will be spread over 10 years.
Ford is expected to invest a total of $105 million for facility and technology upgrades and the purchase of new machinery and equipment. "Ford is facing unprecedented competitive challenges, and this type of partnership support enhances our ability to work together closely to set the stage for additional opportunities in the future," says Curt Magleby, Ford's director of state and local government and community relations. Louisville Mayor Jerry Abramson says the Ford plants are critical to the Louisville area and the incentives will help ensure that the automaker stays in Kentucky: "The Ford plants are major employers and important corporate citizens in Louisville, and these incentives will go far in keeping the automaker in our city."
Supply Chain Bottlenecks Creating New “Logistical Hotspots”
Changes in the Incentives Landscape
Front Line: Finding, Creating, and Supporting Talent
The “Great Resignation” Is Impacting Corporate Relocations
Workforce Q4 2021
Communicating Your Project’s Value to Local Stakeholders
The Challenges of Renovating an Existing Facility Into a Food Plant