2012
1. Texas
2. South Carolina
3. Georgia
4. Alabama
5. North Carolina
6. Louisiana
7. Tennessee
8. Indiana
9. Mississippi
10. Oklahoma
2011
1. Texas
2. Georgia
3. Alabama
4. South Carolina
5. Indiana
6. Louisiana
7. North Carolina
8. Tennessee
9. Mississippi
10. California
2010
1. Tennessee
2. Texas
3. South Carolina
4. Alabama
5. Georgia
6. Indiana
7. Mississippi
8. North Carolina
9. Virginia
10. Oklahoma
overall business environment
1. Texas
2. South Carolina
3. Alabama
4. Louisiana
5. North Carolina
NEXT BEST
Indiana, Mississippi,
Georgia, Tennessee, Oklahoma
COST OF DOING BUSINESS
1. Texas
2. Alabama
3. South Carolina
4. Louisiana
5T. Indiana
Mississippi
North Carolina
NEXT BEST
Tennessee, Arkansas, Georgia, Florida,
Oklahoma, Virginia
CORPORATE TAX ENVIRONMENT
1. Texas
2. Nevada
3T. Florida
South Dakota
4. Alabama
5T. South Carolina
Virginia
NEXT BEST
Indiana, Wyoming
INCENTIVES PROGRAMS
1. Texas
2. Louisiana
3. South Carolina
4T. Alabama
Georgia
5. Oklahoma
NEXT BEST
Indiana, Florida, Mississippi, North Carolina, Ohio, Tennessee
CORPORATE STATE GOVERNMENT
1. Louisiana
2. South Carolina
3. Alabama
4. Texas
5. Indiana
NEXT BEST
North Carolina, Mississippi, Tennessee, Georgia, Oklahoma, Arizona
SPEED OF PERMITTING
1. Texas
2T. Alabama
Mississippi
South Carolina
3T. Georgia
Louisiana
ACCESS TO CAPITAL & PROJECT FUNDING
1. Texas
2. California
3. North Carolina
4. Massachusetts
5T. New York
Ohio
Overall labor Climate
1. Georgia
2T. North Carolina
South Carolina
3. Alabama
4. Texas
5. Louisiana
NEXT BEST
Michigan, Mississippi, Florida, Oklahoma, California, Indiana, Arizona
Availability of Skilled Labor
1. Michigan
2. Texas
3T. California
North Carolina
4. Ohio
5. Georgia
NEXT BEST
New York, Massachusetts,
Indiana, Virginia, Arizona, Illinois, New Jersey
Competitive Labor Costs
1. Alabama
2. South Carolina
3. Mississippi
4. Georgia
5. North Carolina
NEXT BEST
Texas, Arkansas, Florida, Tennessee, Kentucky
Leading Work Force Development Programs
1. Georgia
2. South Carolina
3. Louisiana
4T. Alabama
North Carolina
5. Oklahoma
NEXT BEST
Florida
OVERALL INFRASTRUCURE & GLOBAL ACCESS
1. Tennessee
2. Georgia
3. South Carolina
4T. Indiana
Texas
5. Illinois
NEXT BEST
North Carolina, Ohio, Alabama, Kentucky, California
Rail & Highway Accessibility
1T. Illinois
Indiana
2T. Georgia
Ohio
Texas
3. New Jersey
4T. California
Missouri
Tennessee
Certified Sites or Shovel-Ready Programs
1. South Carolina
2. North Carolina
3. Tennessee
4. Alabama
5. Indiana
NEXT BEST
Georgia
Competitive Utility Rates
1. South Carolina
2T. Alabama
Mississippi
Tennessee
3. Georgia
4T. North Carolina
Oregon
5T. Kentucky
Washington
NEXT BEST
Utah
Distribution/
Logistics Hub Access
1. Tennessee
2. Illinois
3T. Georgia
Texas
4T. California
Indiana
5. Ohio
Washington
NEXT BEST
Kentucky, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Virginia
1. Texas
2. Louisiana
3T. Indiana
North Carolina
4T. Georgia
Michigan
5T. Florida
Ohio
Oklahoma
South Carolina
Virginia
NEXT BEST
California, Tennessee
Eric Stavriotis, Senior Vice President, Strategic Consulting, Jones Lang LaSalle
Scott Redabaugh, Managing Director, Jones Lang LaSalle
Dan Levine, Pricipal, MetroCompare LLC
Kathy Mussio, Managing Partner, Atlas Insight
Among states with strong diversified economies, Texas is a standout in this economic cycle. Since 2010, job growth in Texas has accounted for 20 percent of all employment growth from all 50 states and the District of Columbia, and has demonstrated the second-fastest economic growth rate during this period. Growth has been robust across all sectors, signaling a diverse economy and, not surprisingly, population growth. Neighboring Oklahoma has demonstrated this same type of diversified growth.
North Carolina is another example of a state with a diversified economy. The Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill Research Triangle area is a center for pharmaceutical and biotechnology R&D, as well as IT operations, while Charlotte continues to serve as a financial services center with capacity for higher-skilled back-office operations.
In contrast, growth in particular sectors has led to competitive advantages in some states, including government in Virginia, leisure and hospitality in Florida, and education and health services in Louisiana. For Michigan, Indiana, and Ohio, strong economic growth figures have been driven by an increase in manufacturing jobs; meanwhile, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and Virginia have shown strong employment in professional and business services.
Overall Labor Climate
States that are performing well also have deep pools of workers with strong skills and appropriate education levels, available at a cost that is moderate, but competitive. This balance between critical mass and cost of labor is a key factor for the most successful markets. As the economy transitions to a higher level of activity, companies that are anticipating future growth are seeking locations where appropriate labor is available at a reasonable cost today, but also that there is labor available for future expansion.
Some high-performing states have become aligned with a variety of industries seeking myriad skill profiles. One reason that Texas is the top state for business right now is that it offers a variety of labor pools and environments for different kinds of businesses. San Antonio, for instance, has a labor pool suitable for large-scale back-office and call-center operations at a lower cost than in competing similar-sized markets. Austin has a highly educated work force and strong alignment with IT and technical industries, while Dallas has a strong work force for the technical and financial sectors, and both of these cities are lower-cost than competing markets with similar characteristics.
Both Michigan and California have performed well because each has a deep and unique labor pool for particular industry sectors. Michigan has a large labor pool for automotive manufacturing, obviously, as well as the life sciences research emerging from the state's research institutions. Northern California is known, of course, for its technology innovation and its concentration of software engineers and other knowledge workers related to information technology.