Consultants Forum    |   FacilityLocations    |   FastFacility    |   Advertise    |   Subscribe    |   Newsletter    |   RSSRSS
Inward Investment Guides
Workforce Development

Worker Training: How Important Is It?

Access to training programs - and proximity to a technical university - are really more important than reflected by the low ranking given these factors by the respondents to Area Development's 2007 Corporate Survey.

Ed McCallum, Senior Principal, McCallum Sweeney Consulting (Oct/Nov 08)
According to Area Development's 2007 Corporate Survey, training programs as well as proximity to a technical university as factors in the site selection process were only rated as "very important" or "important" by 56.6 percent and 32.7 percent of the survey respondents, respectively. This seems to be at odds with what our clients have consistently vocalized as an area of concern.

There is shortage of labor force skills in the United States that is starting to have far-reaching impacts. The United States granted 53,000 L-1 visas in 2006, up 33 percent from the year 2000; it is estimated that this number will climb to 65,000-70,000 in 2008, with the primary impetus being a severe shortage of skilled workers. In fact, it has been our experience and those of our peers in the industry that the lack of skilled workers is affecting some companies' ability to grow and pursue market opportunities.

Additionally, by 2015, nearly 20 percent of the nation's workers will be 55 years old or older (up from 13 percent now) - a statistic that should be unsettling to manufacturers. This means a transfer of organizational knowledge needs to commence quickly, or this knowledge could disappear very quickly - and permanently - with retirements just around the corner.

So while the survey conducted in 2007 may have stated that training programs and proximity to technical universities are not such important site selection factors, the fact remains that the fourth-ranked factor in this survey was skilled labor. These factors are all interrelated and will become increasingly important over time.

Corporate Survey 2007
Combined Ratings* of 2007 Factors
Site Selection Factors           2006 2007
Ranking
1. Highway accessibility 90.9 96.9
2. Labor costs 95.0 92.3
3. Energy availability and costs 82.4 89.0
4. Availability of skilled labor 85.1 88.7
5. Occupancy or construction costs 85.5 88.2
6. Available land 73.3 85.4
7. Corporate tax rate 90.8 83.8
8. State and local incentives 88.6 83.4
9. Environmental regulations 68.9 83.2
10. Tax Exemptions 86.7 82.8
10T. Proximity to Markets 76.9 82.8
11.
Availability of advanced ICT services
N/A 82.2
12. Low union profile 78.4 80.6
13. Availability of buildings N/A 79.3
14. Right-to-work state 67.1 72.1
15. Proximity to suppliers 49.3 71.8
16. Expedited or "fast-track" permitting N/A 71.5
17. Availability of unskilled labor 65.3 65.2
18. Availability of long-term financing 64.1 63.0
19. Raw materials availability 64.1 62.5
20. Training programs 56.0 56.6
21. Accessibility to major airport 61.4 54.4
22. Railroad service 20.8 38.1
23. Proximity to technical university 30.0 32.7
24. Waterway or oceanport accessibility 17.0 15.2
*All figures are percentages and are the total of "very important" and "important" ratings of the Area Development Corporate Survey and are rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent.
Different Industries, Different Needs
Of course, the importance of both training programs and technical university proximity is a function of both the type of industry and the complexity of the jobs. Add to this the disparity in the quality and availability of these factors from community to community and state to state, and you would be hard-pressed to find total agreement on this issue.

In general, the greater the degree of complexity, innovation, and face-to-face collaboration required in a particular industry, the greater the desire to be close to a technical university. For instance, in the pharmaceutical and biotech sector, there is a direct correlation to the location of research and development centers near universities, where the spillover effect of knowledge can be capitalized upon. In contrast, for both the chemical and automotive sectors, proximity to a university is not so important; however, the availability of training programs is extremely important. These training programs are not only useful to further develop the company's existing work force, but also to create a constant stream of skilled workers to draw upon for growth needs and/or employee attrition.

Of course, a university is a static factor. This means that while the curriculum and funding can be changed to provide special programs to meet industry needs, the university itself is not mobile. The only outreach that can be achieved is through telecommunications and remote campus location. This is not true of training programs. Training programs that specifically address the needs of an employer can be delivered anywhere. The best of all worlds is one where state and local training programs are capable of incorporating expertise from universities, community colleges, and technical training centers, as well as having the ability to tap into private for-profit training centers and being able to deliver this when and where needed.


    Page1 2  Next >>

Share