Manufacturers Losing Intellectual Property to Security Breaches
Although manufacturers understand the importance of securing their intellectual property, few have adequate procedures in place to keep pace with today’s escalating risks.
Q3 2014
Manufacturers understand the importance of securing their intellectual property. According to the survey, they rank “internal operational information” and “intellectual property” as the two types of non-financial data they fear losing the most. Fear of losing “customer/client information” is ranked the lowest out of all business segments, probably because manufacturing facilities are less likely to store this information in the first place.
Nonetheless, few organizations have kept pace with today’s escalating risks, and fewer still are prepared to manage future threats. “You can’t fight today’s threats with yesterday’s strategies,” says Gary Loveland, a principal in PwC’s security practice. “What’s needed is a new model of information security, one that is driven by knowledge of threats, assets, and the motives and targets of potential adversaries.”
According to PwC’s Global State of Information Security® Survey 2014, executives are funding enhanced security activities, with budgets increasing from an average of $2.7 million in 2009 to $4.3 million last year. However, those seeking to undermine these efforts are one step ahead — security breaches increased 25 percent in the last year alone, says the PwC survey. And, unfortunately, even when in place, security technologies and policies often do not prevent incidents, according to the 2013 U.S. State of Cybercrime Survey, co-sponsored by PwC.
When it comes to intellectual property, the Cybercrime Survey notes that the percentage of respondents who have procedures dedicated to protecting IP has actually decreased — from 22 percent in 2011 to 20 percent in 2013. The percentage of those who conduct a regular review of users and access to IP also decreased from 37 percent in 2011 to 31 percent in 2013. Neither finding bodes well in today’s “elevated risk landscape.”
Recent Project Announcements
Toothsure Plans Perry County, Kentucky, Operations
05/04/2026
Applied Optoelectronics Expands Sugar Land, Texas, Production Operations
05/04/2026
IBM Plans Chicago, Illinois, AI Data Center Operations
05/02/2026
Turner Industries Plans New Iberia-Port Allen, Louisiana, Nuclear Fabrication Operations
05/02/2026
Stella-Jones Corporation Expands Lincoln County, Tennessee, Operations
05/02/2026
Adrian Steel Company Expands Lenawee County, Michigan, Operations
05/02/2026
Pivot Bio Expands Hazelwood, Missouri, Operations
04/29/2026
Davis Timber Company Expands DeRidder, Louisiana, Manufacturing Operations
04/28/2026
Blevins Asphalt Expands Mount Vernon, Missouri, Maintenance Operations
04/28/2026
Niagara Bottling Plans Perth, New York, Production-Warehouse Operations
04/26/2026
Marubeni-Itochu Steel America Plans Osceola, Arkansas, Flat-Rolled Steel Operations
04/25/2026
Corderill Plans Meridian, Mississippi, Operations
04/25/2026
Ferrara Candy Plans Orangeburg County, South Carolina, Production Operations
04/25/2026
Blue Ops Plans Valdosta, Georgia, Manufacturing Operations
04/25/2026
Most Read
-
Economic Developer Role Shifting from Deal-Making to Systems Stewardship
Q1 2026
-
Top States for Doing Business in 2024: A Continued Legacy of Excellence
Q3 2024
-
Capitalizing on the OBBBA Before the 2026 Cliff
Q1 2026
-
Where Workforce Capacity Is Being Built — and Where It’s Being Deployed
Q1 2026
-
40th Annual Corporate and 22nd Annual Consultant Site Selection Survey Results
Q1 2026
-
Last Word: Don’t Lose by Winning
Q1 2026
-
2025’s Top States for Business: How the Winners Are Outpacing the Rest
Q3 2025