In Focus: Measure By Measure, Green and Productivity Goals Become Aligned
Does going green mean your workforce becomes more productive? Sometimes — but not all green workplaces are created equal.
Q4 2014
Unearthing the hard evidence that a company’s sustainability programs are — or are not — enhancing productivity requires meaningful metrics that quantify both sustainability tactics and productivity impacts. Of course, many organizations already compile some sustainability and employee productivity data — but comparing these data sets to inform holistic strategies for specific facilities is an emerging concept. In fact, addressing this challenge is the focus of a new research report by the World Green Building Council titled “Health, Wellbeing & Productivity in Offices: the Next Chapter for Green Building.”
Sustainability goals on their own certainly have significant bearing on a company’s bottom line. But the potential value of green workplace programs increases dramatically when it is strategically aligned with workplace productivity goals.
Side-by-Side Comparisons Drive Organizational Value
Sustainability goals on their own certainly have significant bearing on a company’s bottom line. But the potential value of green workplace programs increases dramatically when it is strategically aligned with workplace productivity goals. For example, consider the “3:30:300” rule of thumb. If an organization spends $3 per square foot on annual utilities, $30 on rent, and $300 on payroll, a 2 percent improvement in energy efficiency results in savings of $0.06 per square foot — while a 2 percent improvement in productivity increases value by $6 per square foot. Implementing tactics that support both sides of equation will bring even greater benefit than those developed in isolation.
The key is to use a metrics system that enables easy comparison of green and productive tactics within all applicable categories, such as energy, waste, and water use; space efficiency; and employee wellness and productivity. Evaluating dual line-item impacts in these categories exposes areas for improvement. For example, a facility achieving energy savings may achieve a high “green” score, but a low score in productivity because employees are too hot or cold. The right metrics will enable a company to quantify the impact on annual revenue. Using metrics will also allow managers to quantify the impact of program successes. For example, an office could be right-sized to achieve energy savings by eliminating underutilized space, while being thoughtfully reconfigured to improve productivity with workspaces that better accommodate the work performed within them. Both the energy savings and the productivity improvement can be measured to create a balanced view of the office redesign.
Ultimately, the use of a wide range of metrics and related analyses will provide insights far beyond stating the face value of any single initiative. Enormous potential lies in analyzing data across these traditionally separate realms of sustainability and productivity. Side-by-side impact comparisons can support long-term strategic thinking that strengthens both sustainability and productivity efforts. It’s all in the integrated numbers.
Project Announcements
ValorFlex Packaging Plans Bowling Green, Kentucky, Production Operations
06/30/2025
Neuro.io Plans Terrebonne Parish, Louisiana, Operations
06/30/2025
Germany-Based MTU Maintenance Expands Fort Worth, Texas, MRO Operations
06/30/2025
Cascade Die Casting Group Expands High Point, North Carolina, Manufacturing Operations
06/30/2025
BuildOps Plans Raleigh, North Carolina, Operations
06/30/2025
Point Blank Enterprises Plans Wakulla County, Florida, Operations
06/30/2025
Most Read
-
20th Annual Area Development Gold and Silver Shovel Awards
Q2 2025
-
First Person: Joe Capes, CEO, LiquidStack
Q2 2025
-
The Legal Limits of DEI in Incentives Agreements, Hiring, and Contracting
Q2 2025
-
From Silicon to Server: Mapping the Data Center Supply Chain
Q2 2025
-
39th Annual Corporate & 21st Annual Consultants Surveys: What Business Leaders and Consultants Are Saying About Site Selection
Q1 2025
-
Rethinking Life Sciences Site Selection in a Resilient and Dynamic Market
Q2 2025
-
Top States for Doing Business in 2024: A Continued Legacy of Excellence
Q3 2024