Redevelopment of Former Coal Plant Sites
Industrial real estate firms are joining environmental investors to redevelop former coal plant sites in an effort to breathe new life into the communities where they are located.
The decommissioning of U.S. coal-fired power plants, according to the U.S. EIA, is not limited to any one state nor to any one type of coal. The three largest coal plants to cease operation in 2019 were in Pennsylvania (FirstEnergy Bruce Mansfield), Arizona (Navajo), and Alabama (Gorgas).
Energy Companies Seek Out Industry Experts
With even more coal-fired plants projected to come offline in 2020 and beyond, energy companies are seeking industry experts in the decommissioning, site remediation, sales, and redevelopment of these sites. For example, Southern Illinois-based industrial real estate brokerage firm BARBERMURPHY is actively working with coal-fired power plant owners, environmental remediation companies, and others to assist in the decommissioning, sale, and redevelopment of these sites.
BARBERMURPHY principal and broker Steve Zuber, SIOR, has been working with St. Louis-based Commercial Development Company (CDC) in the disposition and repurposing of these plants, most recently the Meredosia Power Station (formerly owned and operated by Ameren Energy Medina Valley Cogen LLC) located 100 miles west of Springfield, Ill. Commercial Development Company’s affiliate, Environmental Liability Transfer (ELT), acquired the plant in November 2019 and anticipates a two-year time frame to remediate and repurpose the 75-acre site, which operated as a power plant from 1948 through mid-2011. Permitting, asbestos abatement, waste removal, environmental remediation and restoration, liquidation of surplus machinery and equipment, and demolition of most of the Meredosia plant’s infrastructure is included in ELT’s scope of work. Since 2014, the firm has assumed and abated nearly $2 billion in corporate environmental liability.
The decommissioning of U.S. coal-fired power plants, according to the U.S. EIA, is not limited to any one state nor to any one type of coal. “BARBERMURPHY is intently involved in the disposition and repurposing of this site,” Zuber says. “The existing substation and power grid will remain intact, which is a plus for users with high energy requirements. We’re looking at a wide array of different industrial users that can utilize this site, from solar energy producers that want to tie into the power grid to heavy manufacturing companies that need power from the grid. Another attraction is the Illinois River for access to barging services.”
The Meredosia site is but one example of plant site redevelopment. Illinois’ identity as one of 16 states with deregulated electricity markets also positions it well in terms of remarketing its decommissioned coal-fired power plant sites to green-energy prospects, says Zuber. “The cost of power here in Illinois is certainly more competitive than in many other states,” he notes.
According to Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) Bureau of Air spokeswoman Kim Biggs, Meredosia is in good company with a host of other coal-fired power plants to have ceased operations in Illinois over the past nine years. Biggs cited the 2016 closure of Dynegy Midwest Generation LLC’s Wood River Power Station on the Illinois side of the St. Louis MSA and 10 other plants in northern and central Illinois.
“There are currently 11 coal-fired power plants that remain in operation in Illinois,” says Biggs. “Illinois EPA cannot speculate on the future status of the remaining coal-fired power plants. The agency does not expect to see any new coal-fired power plant developments in Illinois’ future.”
The 11 operational coal-fired power plants in Illinois, according to the IEPA, include three plants in Baldwin, Newton, and Peoria owned by Vistra Energy (which acquired Dynegy in 2018); NRG’s plants in Pekin, Waukegan and Will County; Electric Energy Inc.’s plant in Joppa; Dominion Energy’s plant in Kincaid; CWLP’s Interstate plant in Springfield; Southern Illinois Electric Cooperative’s plant near Marissa; and Prairie State Generating Co., LLC’s plant, also near Marissa in Washington County.
As each site is ready for redevelopment, Biggs says property owners can enroll in the IEPA’s Voluntary Site Remediation Program. The program provides IEPA review, technical assistance, and no further remediation determinations from the agency. “Currently the former Crawford Power Station in Chicago (which ceased operation in 2012) is enrolled in this program,” she says.
Attributes of Power Plant Reclamation
Commercial Development Company is actively targeting industrial real estate, including power plants, for redevelopment. Marketing Director John Kowalik says CDC has purchased seven retired coal-fired power plants since 2014, representing more than 3,700 megawatts of retired generation capacity. “And as energy markets continue to embrace more efficient and renewable technologies, we expect significantly more acquisitions over the next few years,” Kowalik says.
Once a power plant closes, beyond the job losses and tax revenue losses, the environmental impact from historic plant operations still needs to be resolved. That’s where CDC steps in. “Without a buyer willing to take the risk, old shuttered power plants could remain in a perpetual state of decay and deterioration,” he explains. “That’s not a good scenario for the utility or the surrounding community.”
Preparing a site for reuse is often a complex, multi-year process that includes not only decommissioning and demolition but also cleaning up contamination existing in materials, soil and/or groundwater. Kowalik agrees with Zuber that the range of potential end-users of these sites is very broad. “One of the incredible attributes of power plant reclamation is that the real estate typically has built-in infrastructure components that can be easily reused for new industries…access to rail, access to waterways and ports, access to highway transportation, access to utility grids, and so on,” he says. “Additionally, retired power plants are typically located in areas where there is a strong talent base and the need for good-paying jobs.”
In addition to the Meredosia, Ill., site, CDC’s plant redevelopment projects include Brayton Point Power Station (Dynegy) in Somerset, Mass.; Tanners Creek Power Plant (Indiana Michigan Power) in Lawrenceburg, Ind.; Mighty Marysville Power Plant (DTE) in Marysville, Mich.; Chamois Power Plant (AECI) in Chamois, Mo.; Fox Lake Generating Station (Alliant) in Sherburn, Minn.; and Picway Power Plant (AEP) in Pickaway County, Ohio.
Massachusetts is among the states that are doing their part to promote redevelopment of former coal-fired power plant sites. According to the U.S. EPA, the Massachusetts legislature launched the Plant Revitalization Task Force several years ago and created a plan for redeveloping the Salem Harbor Power Station. The state’s strategy also includes a plan for decommissioning other coal-fired power plants that were facing imminent closure throughout the state. Massachusetts provided $100,000 for each of three reuse studies.
And in Illinois, several years back, former Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel appointed a nonprofit environmental policy organization to engage the public and business leaders to forge a plan for redeveloping the previously mentioned decommissioned Fisk and Crawford coal-fired plant in Chicago.
State and federal government brownfields initiatives are another framework within which former power plant sites are being cleaned up and repurposed. At the state level, tax increment financing (TIF) is also a means through which municipalities can cover upfront cleanup and infrastructure costs.
In the private sector, commercial and investment funding mechanisms are often used to finance these redevelopment projects, as is the scenario with CDC and Meredosia, among others. Program-related investments (PRIs) may also fund the redevelopment of power plants, according to the U.S. EPA. PRIs are loans, loan guarantees, or equity investments made by a foundation to support charitable activities. Educational and research institutions may also contribute to redevelopment by conducting initial feasibility analyses and renewing remediation options.
Regardless of the source of funding to make these deals happen, preparing a site for reuse is often a complex, multi-year process that includes not only decommissioning and demolition but also cleaning up contamination existing in materials, soil and/or groundwater. But a tiny town in central Pennsylvania is making it happen. Within the next 60 days, a 38,400-square-foot medical marijuana growing facility is expected to open in Shamokin Dam, Pa., employing 60 people on a 219-acre site upon which stood a coal-fired power plant that operated for more than 60 years before closing in 2014.
Pennsylvania publishes detailed “playbooks” for each coal-fired power plant that retires, outlining specific property characteristics for potential investors. Denise Brinley, executive director at the Pennsylvania’s Office of Energy, says these playbooks are proving to be an effective means of marketing the redevelopment of sites like this one. “We don’t want sites with infrastructure like these to be underutilized, eyesores on the community, and offer no real tax revenue or employment opportunities going forward,” Brinley says. “They have great potential for future redevelopment that can breathe new life into communities.”
How Is the Pandemic Affecting Location Decisions in the Food & Beverage Industry?
2019 Leading Metro Locations: Pacific and South-Atlantic Metros Dominate the List
COVID-19 Will Remake How We Work and Live
A “Now, Next, Later” Approach for Dealing with Pandemic Challenges
The Future of Manufacturing Site Selection is Connected
“Future-Proofing” Corporate Location Decisions in Uncertain Times