Taking Up the Right-to-Work Debate
Right-to-work and unionization issues are heating up Missouri's labor environment, and could affect site selection decisions.
March 2011
Missouri is not one of these states and, in early February 2011, the Missouri State Senate held hearings to determine whether the state should become right-to-work. Opponents of right-to-work laws say unions provide a steady supply of trained workers; proponents say making union membership a condition of employment infringes on an individual's liberties.
The debate was brought before the Missouri Senate by its President Pro Tem Rob Mayer. He claimed that communities in Southeast Missouri had lost business to its right-to-work neighbors - Arkansas and Tennessee. Missouri also shares borders with four other right-to-work states - Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, and Oklahoma - and with two non-right-to-work states - Illinois and Kentucky.
During, the debate, a well-know site selection consultant, Mark Sweeney, Principal of McCallum Sweeney Consulting based in Greenville, South Carolina, provided some insight into the role of a state's right-to-work status in the site selection process. According to Sweeney, nearly all of his firm's manufacturing clients have expressed a preference for operating a nonunion facility.
"Companies believe this gives them greater work force flexibility, thereby allowing them to compete more effectively and in a more timely manner," Sweeney explained.
In addition, wages and benefits in unionized plants are generally higher than in those that are not unionized, and work rules in those union shops generally result in larger staffs. Sweeney cited these conditions as another reason his firm's clients prefer to keep the unions out of their facilities. "Those manufacturing clients express an interest in considering [locations] only in right-to-work states," Sweeney said, although his firm recommends that right-to-work be just "another scoring criteria" and not a "pass-fail" decision. Unfortunately, states that are eliminated because of this scoring criteria, never even know they were left out of consideration, Sweeney further noted.
What Do Our Readers Have to Say?
What did Area Development's corporate readers tell us about the right-to-work factor in our 2010 Corporate Survey? Among the 26 site selection factors ranked by the survey respondents, right-to-work placed 16th, with slightly more than two-thirds (67.9 percent) considering this factor "very important" or "important." However, this was down from 14th position in 2009, when 74 percent of our Corporate Survey respondents rated this factor as "very important" or "important." Among the consultants responding to our 2010 Consultants Survey, 71.3 percent rated the right-to-work factor as "very important" or "important," down from 81.2 percent in 2009.
The drop in importance of right-to-work in our surveys may coincide with the drop in union membership nationwide: unionized workers fell to 11.9 percent of the work force in 2010, from 12.3 percent in 2009. And, for the first time, government employees accounted for more than half of the nation's union membership. However, in Missouri, union membership rose from 9.4 percent in 2009 to 9.9 percent in 2010, defying the national trend.
In 1978, Missourians overwhelmingly defeated a right-to-work law. How this issue plays out in Missouri in 2011 might affect whether challenges arise in other non-right-to-work states and ultimately where you might want to place your next facility. You can let me know your thoughts about the issue by contacting gerri@areadevelopment.com.
Recent Project Announcements
PowerFlo Solutions Plans Wood County, West Virginia, Manufacturing Operations
07/18/2026
Peak Energy Plans Sacramento, California, Manufacturing Operations
07/18/2026
Creel Plans Colorado Springs, Colorado, Shelling-Distribution Operations
07/18/2026
Pryer Aerospace Expands Claremore, Oklahoma, Production Operations
07/18/2026
Aluminum Dynamics Plans Lowndes County, Mississippi, Manufacturing Operations
07/18/2026
Highline Warren Plans McDonough, Georgia, Logistics Operations
07/17/2026
Meta Plans Sturgeon County, Alberta, Canada, Data Center Operations
07/17/2026
Taiwan-Based LITEON Plans McKinney, Texas, Headquarters-Manufacturing Operations
07/15/2026
Meta Expands Richland Parish, Louisiana, Data Center Operations
07/15/2026
France-Based Pierre Guérin Plans Clayton, North Carolina, Production Operations
07/15/2026
Ricardo Upgrades Van Buren Township, Michigan, Operations
07/15/2026
LM Marine Services Expands Charlevoix, Michigan, Operations
07/15/2026
Securin Expands Albuquerque, New Mexico, Operations
07/15/2026
British-Based Zotefoams Expands Walton, Kentucky, Headquarters Operations
07/13/2026
Most Read
-
Rethinking Environmental Review
Q2 2026
-
The RFI Is No Longer the Starting Line
Q3 2026
-
21st Annual Shovel Awards: The American Industrial Economy Remade in Real Time
Q2 2026
-
Where Early-Stage Life Sciences Companies Get Stuck Scaling Their Real Estate—and How to Move Forward
Q2 2026
-
The Primary Problem
Q3 2026
-
Why America's Largest Companies Are Investing in Skilled Trades
Q2 2026
-
Avoid These Red Flags, Deal Killers, and Blunders in Site Selection
Q2 2026