24th Annual Corporate Survey Analysis by David Brandon
Dec/Jan 10
Whereas once availability, reliability, and quality led the way in site selection judgments, cost has now joined the vanguard of factors in a very prominent role. Circumstances such as intensifying global competition; the rise of China, India, and the ASEAN markets; political unrest; credit market difficulties; compressed times to market; and global recession have all combined to produce the importance that site selectors have accorded to cost factors in the 2009 Corporate Survey.
Commodity and specialty producers alike have felt the sting of global cost competition. Spikes in energy costs have permeated virtually every aspect of business operations and left an impression that will not fade so quickly as in the 1970s and 1980s. Dramatic increases in benefits costs, especially health insurance, have contributed rather publicly to our cost sensitivities and have highlighted the labor costs gaps that exist between the United States and industrializing nations.
It comes as little surprise then that, in this market, labor costs has risen to the top of the list of site selection factors. Nor is it a startling revelation that seven of the top 10 site selection factors in the 2009 Corporate Survey relate directly to a location's cost profile. Labor, taxes, energy, facilities, and transportation costs dominate the top-10 landscape.
Similarly, incentives have never, in my opinion, occupied so prominent a position in searches for new sites. Tax credits have largely lost their allure. Many site selectors view them as meaningless in their efforts to distinguish between competing locations. As noted near the top of the list, tax exemptions and related state and local incentives that generate "cash" with which to reduce capital expenditures and lower start-up costs are exerting powerful forces in site selection projects across the globe.
Overall, "cost" is top of mind for site selectors today. As the 2009 Corporate Survey recognizes, location costs, start-up costs, and operations costs combine to concentrate our attentions on locations with comparatively low and stable cost profiles.
Recent Project Announcements
MMY US Plans Cleveland, Ohio, Manufacturing Operations
07/04/2026
Orion Edge Group Expands Tampa, Florida, Operations
07/03/2026
Auto Parts Manufacturing Mississippi Expands Lee County, Mississippi, Production Operations
07/03/2026
Germany-Based Goldhofer Plans Hickory, North Carolina, Production Operations
07/03/2026
Rural King Plans Henry County, Virginia, Distribution Operations
07/02/2026
ANS Plans Columbus, Ohio, Headquarters Operations
07/02/2026
Hybar Expands Osceola, Arkansas, Operations
06/30/2026
South Korea-Based Sam Dong Expands Delaware, Ohio, Production Operations
06/30/2026
Garonit Pharmaceutical Plans Flanders, New Jersey, Operations
06/29/2026
Turkey-Based Fibrosan Plans Cassopolis, Michigan, Manufacturing Operations
06/29/2026
Space Tango Expands Lexington, Kentucky, Operations
06/27/2026
Hanni Family Plans West Bend, Wisconsin, Headquarters Operations
06/27/2026
Quantum Global Technologies Expands Austin, Texas, Operations
06/26/2026
Deckorators Establishes Lackawanna, New York, Manufacturing-Distribution Operations
06/26/2026
Most Read
-
Rethinking Environmental Review
Q2 2026
-
21st Annual Shovel Awards: The American Industrial Economy Remade in Real Time
Q2 2026
-
Where Early-Stage Life Sciences Companies Get Stuck Scaling Their Real Estate—and How to Move Forward
Q2 2026
-
Avoid These Red Flags, Deal Killers, and Blunders in Site Selection
Q2 2026
-
2025’s Top States for Business: How the Winners Are Outpacing the Rest
Q3 2025
-
The Missing Middle: Pre-Commercial Life Science Companies and the Incentives Gap Impacting Future Clusters
Q2 2026
-
What Korean Manufacturers Underestimate About Building in America
Q2 2026